The AI Con

How To Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want

Hardcover, 240 pages

English language

Published by Penguin Random House.

ISBN:
978-1-84792-861-0
Copied ISBN!
(7 reviews)

A smart, incisive take-down of the bogus claims being made about so-called ‘artificial intelligence’, exposing the real harm these technologies do to our jobs, health, society and environment, who stands to gain from them, and how to fight back.

Is AI going to take over the world? Have scientists created an artificial lifeform that can think on its own? Is it going to replace all our jobs, even creative ones, like doctors, teachers and care-workers? Are we about to enter an age where computers are better than humans at everything?

The answers to these questions, as the expert authors of The AI Con make clear, are 'no', 'they wish', 'LOL', and 'definitely not'. In fact, these fears are all symptoms of the hype being used by tech corporations to justify data theft, motivate surveillance capitalism, and devalue human creativity so they can replace meaningful work with jobs that treat people …

1 edition

We don't have to accept this

AI is being increasingly pushed as inevitable everywhere, but this book provides hope and recommendations for how to see through that hype. I had a slightly different perspective than most of the audience of this book, as a developer who has worked for years in language technology, but for the most part, the technical details matched my experience. I definitely recommend this book for anyone wanting to push back on the attempts by businesses and government agencies to automate away our jobs, knowledge, and vital services, which has become even more important in the last few months.

The AI Con

This is a great summary of everything that's wrong with the current hype around AI and especially LLMs. It doesn't expect any prior knowledge to the field and is a very good introduction to a lay audience. The authors (@emilymbender@dair-community.social and @alex@dair-community.social) also have a great podcast that I'd recommend: "Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000".

The book has so many quotable passages that I can't possibly list them all here but to give you an idea: * In the vast majority of cases, AI is not going to replace your job. But it will make your job a lot shittier. * As with AI "art" discussed above, AI boosters think that science is only about ideas, rather than communities of practice. * The point of talk therapy is not to exchange text strings, but rather human connection, which furthermore is guided by the expertise of the therapist. And …

The problem is clear; we need sharper solutions

A much-needed overview of the shortcomings of AI - and, in particular, of the AI vendors. There's a lot here that's important for everyone to understand as the technology threatens to become omnipresent. I'm glad to recommend it as a primer; it's important to keep your eyes open. But the question is left open: okay, so now what?

I liked the suggestion that smaller, more ethically-trained, more specific software is better, and I completely agree. But in a world where the generalist models are being added to everything, where rampant surveillance is being incentivized by their use, and where businesses and non-profits are being held accountable by their shareholders and board members to investigate the technology because of the hype surrounding it, what are the real, immediate solutions? The problem is clear; the way forward is not.

A very solid pushback on all of the AI Hype

I enjoyed reading this book, though as someone who watches Mystery AI Hype Theatre 3000 pretty regularly, the information contained within is something I was already aware of.

For those of you who haven't read it, give it a read - it covers a lot of the underlying lies being bandied about in the current AI Hype bubble, and the sheer amount of bullshit coming out of Silicon Valley as they desperately grasp for the trillion dollar use case.

Overall, pretty short, but extremely well cited. The only ding I'm giving the book is that I think the prose could have been structured a bit better, there are a bunch of "we'll cover this in {x} section" or "we covered this in {x} section" as you go through and I think you'd have needed less of that were the sections reorganized a bit to have a stronger "narrative" arc.

avatar for rinze

rated it

avatar for Moosadee

rated it

Subjects

  • Artificial Intelligence