Zero

The Biography of a Dangerous Idea

256 pages

English language

Published Sept. 5, 2000 by Penguin (Non-Classics).

ISBN:
978-0-14-029647-1
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

4 stars (19 reviews)

The Babylonians invented it, the Greeks banned it, the Hindus worshiped it, and the Church used it to fend off heretics. Now it threatens the foundations of modern physics. For centuries the power of zero savored of the demonic; once harnessed, it became the most important tool in mathematics. For zero, infinity’s twin, is not like other numbers. It is both nothing and everything.

In Zero, Science Journalist Charles Seife follows this innocent-looking number from its birth as an Eastern philosophical concept to its struggle for acceptance in Europe, its rise and transcendence in the West, and its ever-present threat to modern physics. Here are the legendary thinkers—from Pythagoras to Newton to Heisenberg, from the Kabalists to today’s astrophysicists—who have tried to understand it and whose clashes shook the foundations of philosophy, science, mathematics, and religion. Zero has pitted East against West and faith against reason, and its intransigence persists …

10 editions

Review of 'Zero' on Goodreads

3 stars

1) ''To Pythagoras, playing music was a mathematical act. Like squares and triangles, lines were number-shapes, so dividing a string into two parts was the same as taking a ratio of two numbers. The harmony of the monochord was the harmony of mathematics -- and the harmony of the universe. Pythagoras concluded that ratios govern not only music but also other types of beauty. To the Pythagoreans, ratios and proportions controlled musical beauty, physical beauty, and mathematical beauty. Understanding nature was as simple as understanding the mathematics of proportions.''

2) ''How big are the rational numbers? They take up no space at all. It's a tough concept to swallow, but it's true.
Even though there are rational numbers everywhere on the number line, they take up no space at all. If we were to throw a dart at the number line, it would never hit a rational number. Never. And …

avatar for Jeff

rated it

4 stars
avatar for HolyMachina

rated it

4 stars
avatar for fakelvis

rated it

3 stars
avatar for willadams

rated it

4 stars
avatar for GrampaSiFiG

rated it

3 stars
avatar for haagen_daz

rated it

4 stars
avatar for chris_st

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Elspeth

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Alexander

rated it

2 stars
avatar for fighting

rated it

3 stars
avatar for Kaslov

rated it

5 stars
avatar for philiporange

rated it

5 stars
avatar for rototrav

rated it

4 stars
avatar for UdeRecife

rated it

4 stars
avatar for sellout

rated it

4 stars
avatar for stevegio

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Applemcg

rated it

4 stars