Tsundoku reviewed Romanov by Nadine Brandes
No one but me played Shadow Hearts: Covenant, and Frankly, I'm fine with that.
4 stars
Book CWs: Illness, Confinement, Blood and / or Gore (though it is Not as in-depth as it could have been); just things you'd expect from the Russian Revolution.
I will confess, Anastasia Romanov is a Special Interest of mine, has been for like, more than a decade. I'm not getting into why I really got into her, because in retrospect (of last time someone asked), it wasn't the well known Fox movie, it was a game, and no one played the game I'm talking about, and I'd be mortified to recommend it now because I know it hasn't aged well!
This is a fun (well, as fun as the subject can be) tale combining the Romanovs with fantastical magic. It diverges from history around the 50% mark.
There's an afterword explaining the historical differences.
I'm saying it everywhere, but the following is mostly for the Fediverse:
If you are looking …
Book CWs: Illness, Confinement, Blood and / or Gore (though it is Not as in-depth as it could have been); just things you'd expect from the Russian Revolution.
I will confess, Anastasia Romanov is a Special Interest of mine, has been for like, more than a decade. I'm not getting into why I really got into her, because in retrospect (of last time someone asked), it wasn't the well known Fox movie, it was a game, and no one played the game I'm talking about, and I'd be mortified to recommend it now because I know it hasn't aged well!
This is a fun (well, as fun as the subject can be) tale combining the Romanovs with fantastical magic. It diverges from history around the 50% mark.
There's an afterword explaining the historical differences.
I'm saying it everywhere, but the following is mostly for the Fediverse:
If you are looking for a critique of Russia / the Russian Revolution / the USSR besides "communism doesn't work!" look elsewhere. This is not the book for that. Honestly probably try a nonfiction book addressing the USSR.
And this probably goes without saying, but if you are looking for a critique of Czar Nicholas II's ruling, look elsewhere. There's mild critique (in the sense very few people historically knew about Alexei's hemophilia and yeah that was probably a bad move) but if you're expecting one of the Romanovs to suddenly go "yeah that 1905 Bloody Sunday was absolutely shameful, we suck" I don't even want to do the math to figure out how old any of the kids would have been, but I'm guessing pretty young. I mean I think you could find a way to do it (coming from one of the soldier's mouths, not the protagonist) but I mean, come on. Be realistic.
