#genai

See tagged statuses in the local BookWyrm community

⚡ Researchers Just Found Something Extremely Alarming About AI's Power Usage

「 As detailed in a new paper, researchers from the open-source AI platform Hugging Face found that the energy demands of text-to-video generators quadruple when the length of a generated video doubles — indicating that the power required for increasingly sophisticated generations doesn’t scale linearly 」

https://futurism.com/future-society/ai-power-usage-text-to-video-generator

If current-generation LLM-based chatbots can drive people to commit crimes or even take their own lives, what do you suppose Neuralink would do to people?

The first thing I said to the person who suggested to me that human brains might be directly hooked to a computer, whenever that was, was "everyone will go insane immediately". I still believe that, but now we're beginning to see evidence.


This is not a hot take. what do you do when fate drops you on a manuscript where a part (in my case the code) has been written using and IT SHOWS? I have run, edited, refactored and validated this pile of nonsense but I do not have the resources to write it anew (we started at ca 2000 lines, after my cleaning about 500).

Should our AI statement be “Parts of the code have been generated using ChatGPT without the consent of all authors”?

The context is the field of so journals have no or vague requirements

I will give a webinar "Demystifying AI" targeted at non-technical people, primarily working in the third sector or consultants working for the third sector.

It's scheduled for Thursday 18 Sept, at 11:00 UK time, on Zoom.

If you are interested, let me know, I can DM you a link to the registration.

To be clear: I will be explaining why it is bad.

*** Important for and with copyrighted books that may have been stolen by , the company, to train their .*** There is going to be a final settlement. sent out an email about this you will have received if you are a member (I am). The settlement will be substantial.

SFWA Website for Details: https://www.sfwa.org/2025/08/15/press-release-august-15-2025/

Register here: https://www.anthropiccopyrightsettlement.com

Link to legal documents: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.434709/gov.uscourts.cand.434709.362.0_5.pdf

I like to poke LinkedIn once in awhile with an "AI" critique to see what I can stir up. One reason I do this is to keep an eye on the changing form of the booster rhetoric. Nowadays a lot of folks respond to critique with some form of "today's LLMs are bad but tomorrow's will be amazing", the true believer/quasi-religious response with a touch of false humility for flavor. Yesterday I got a "AI critics are just as bad as AI boosters" false dichotomy, which by my read was a variant of the "AI critics are hysterical and irrational" with the twist that the speaker was suggesting that boosters are too. That felt new-ish to me. Granted, the hubristic "we're the smart guys in the room, you should do what we say" framing is ancient in the tech industry. Suggesting the boosters are also not the smart guys in …