Maybe it's having had life changing surgery recently (amputation) and probably being terminally ill (cancer), but I might be expecting more out of some books than I'm getting, and this was very true of Pachinko. I finished it last night. Today, I went online and searched for reviews of it. The reviews I found were overwhelmingly positive and used words like "stunning" to describe it. That was true even when I put "pachinko negative reviews" in the search bar.
 I'm scratching my head over this. While it's clear that the author worked hard on it and did a good deal of research, I failed to find one instance of memorable writing in it. There were no memorable images, and while the characters were interesting enough, none were portrayed so well that I felt that I knew them. And no, the fact that most of the novel takes place in Japan accounts for that last criticism; I lived in Japan for three years, which happened to be the last three years in which Pachinko takes place.
It was all just this-happened-then-this-happened-then-this-happened. I can picture the author with a huge sheet of paper to keep track of the six decades covered in Pachinko (or the computer version of that) but I can't picture her going over her workaday prose to see if she can heighten it a little.
 At no point does she even describe pachinko properly. She, like many westerners, describes it as a sort of vertical pinball game. That's not even close. Yes, there are ball bearings involved, but unlike pinball, there are no flaps, and the balls are numerous and small—about half the diameter of a marble. All you do is put the balls in, turn a knob, and watch them fall. You hope they fall into places that generate more balls, which you can redeem for money, but it's all luck. Pachinko has much more in common with slot machines than it does with any pinball game. Pachinko parlors of the era she writes about were noisy, garishly lit, smoke-filled places.
 If you have an interest in the life those with Korean backgrounds who live in Japan have, you'll learn about it by reading Pachinko, but it's a pretty inefficient way to learn that.
By the way, I have no idea why this site is saying I read it twice. Believe me, I did not but I can't find a way to change that. It's a bug that's been in Goodreads's system for awhile and they often say they've fixed it, but they obviously have not.