Back
Alan Watts: In my own way (Paperback, 2007, New World Library, Distributed by Publishers Group West)

Now it is the papal infallibility and orthodox dogma of the present scientific establishment that plants are mechanisms without intelligence, and that they have neither feeling nor capacity for purposeful action. A little child hasn’t been told this, and therefore knows better. I knew that plants, moths, birds, and rabbits were people—as is exemplified in such tales as The Wind in the Willows, Winnie the Pooh, and innumerable folk tales from all cultures. Anthropologists and historians of religion dismiss this as animism, the most primitive, superstitious, and depraved of all those systems and beliefs which, in the course of historical progress, eventually blossom into Christianity or dialectical materialism. It is thus that our entire civilization has no respect for plants or for animals other than pets—the flattering dog, the wily cat, the obedient horse, and the mimicking parrot. It is high time to go back, or on, to animism and to cultivate good manners toward all sentient beings, including vegetables, and even lakes and mountains.

In my own way by 

i think i have the same sort of feelings about watt's animism as i do about gaia stuff.

i am skeptical of such a reaching notion of sentience, but also i think that the kind of person a belief system like that produces would be someone i'd consider admirable/moral

to be real with yuh, i would love to come to the point that i could see a mountain or a river as alive. i think that'd be a v cool perspective to hold