Reviews and Comments

gamer

gamer@bookwyrm.social

Joined 2 years, 11 months ago

gaming

This link opens in a pop-up window

Arthur Miller: Death of Salesman (IN ENGLISH & KOREAN LANGUAGE) / (#29) (Paperback, 2005, YBM-Si-sa) 4 stars

The blood of Willy Lohman flows in all of us. The story of the salesman …

Review of 'Death of Salesman (IN ENGLISH & KOREAN LANGUAGE) / (#29)' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

What a gut punch. Had me immersed from the first page on. The dialogue flows really well, the characters are basically alive and the story is amazing.
Really wish I could see a play live.

Review of 'Timeless Simplicity' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

Good intro to simple living, although really lacking in fresh ideas.

Most of the book is quotes, which were also the best parts.

Lack of real, pragmatic direction, leaving the reader stuck in this weird limbo where the philosophy (?) isn't really that profound, nor practical. It's only 90ish pages, and those feel like a drag more often than not.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich (Everyman's Library (Cloth)) (1995, Everyman's Library) 4 stars

Review of "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich (Everyman's Library (Cloth))" on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

Man this is a slog fest. I went into it completely blind, expecting nothing, so maybe that's my problem. Not much happens, it's literally just a day in the life of someone in a gulag. The (translated) prose is really good, and it made me finish a book I really didn't care about.

Arthur Schopenhauer: Studies In Pessimism (Paperback, 2004, Kessinger Publishing) 4 stars

Review of 'Studies In Pessimism' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

I might not like most of what he had to say, but I can't point at a logical error. Modern sensibilities will be attacked from all sides, people will want to respond with various ad hominems about the author, but it all just falls flat.

Short, written in a good style (no idea how much the translation changed), without much of the typical focus on abstract systems.

Some notes on the edition: For some reason the fucking latin isn't translated? Why? Plenty of footnotes about certain references to other authors, and historical events, but the latin stayed.

David Graeber, David Wengrow: The Dawn of Everything (Hardcover, 2021, Farrar, Straus and Giroux) 4 stars

The renowned activist and public intellectual David Graeber teams up with the professor of comparative …

Review of 'The Dawn of Everything' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

Good lord this is a massive book (don't let the page count fool you).
In terms of writing style:
- everything is written clearly, there are no unexplained references to political or scientific figures, no over-use of scientific wording or reliance on other works to explain concepts (the importance of this cannot be overstated)
- sentences kind of flow together too much, I found myself highlighting dozens of pages at once, because that's quite literally how long it took to state something sometimes
- there was an overuse of question -> long unpacking of question -> answer posed as question -> unpacking of answer posed as question -> proof of answer. I get that the question needed to be asked in an appealing way, to get people like me to keep reading, but for backtracking this is going to be painful as shit.
On the content:
- detailed to death, …

Friedrich Nietzsche: Twilight of the idols, or, How to philosophize with the hammer (1997) 4 stars

Review of 'Twilight of the idols, or, How to philosophize with the hammer' on 'Goodreads'

No rating

This is a pretty short book, and although I'd complain that Nietzsche really just kinda complains about everything and anything, it's still a decent read. The arguments of course aren't something you can disassemble or criticize on a first read (especially on my gas station copy). He also explicitly says his Zarathustra is the most important book of all time and implies that literally everyone else but him was wrong.
Although generally, I'd recommend this to pretty much everyone, especially those who are tired of the mental and spiritual focus of most thinkers. Hates Christianity (but I think most Christians need to read him regardless), and has a boner for ancient Rome.

Hermann Hesse: Steppenwolf (Paperback, 1999, Penguin Books, Limited (UK)) 4 stars

Review of 'Steppenwolf' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

This will be the most biased review of all time. I think I've discovered the book at the perfect time in my life (as I hit an all-time low in my mid-to-late 20s). I think a more successful version of myself, would have instantly discarded it whole, rated it as "too pretentious". If I was 16 I'd have said "bruh this Hesse is trippin frfr". And if I was in my 50s, I'd have said the main character is too much of a bitch. Even if I'd read a copy without the contextualized mini-biography, I'd have probably liked it a lot less. Genuinely just a perfect shitstorm of events.

It's almost as if the goal of the book is for you to outgrow it. Sure, there's literary merit to it all. The story keeps you gripped, the characters are okay, and it's generally unique. I assume someone well versed in …

Jack Weatherford, Jonathan Davis: Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World (AudiobookFormat, 2014, Brilliance Audio) 4 stars

The name Genghis Khan often conjures the image of a relentless, bloodthirsty barbarian on horseback …

Review of 'Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

Lots of over-sensationalized stuff. And this moment... changed the world..... Genghis dies (spoiler alert) half-way through. A lot of it seems like a dramatic retelling of what seems like a single (unreliable) source. I know this is unfair to put in a review, but things I was interested in were replaced by things I wasn't interested in. So that really hurt my enjoyment in general.

Some things were pointed out that I really wasn't expecting. The diet differences between the Mongols and the conquered people and how it mattered was one such thing. Most of it was like trivia that I'll forget in 2 weeks.