Moon's extraordinary, Nebula Award-winning novel is the story of an autistic man who is offered the chance to be "cured" by science. He must decide if he should submit to a surgery that might completely change the way he views the world and the very essence of who he is.
The story of a man with autism and his difficult decision to undergo an experimental cure. Although science fiction in the sense of being set in future and the cure needing science, that is not the centre of the book. The central character is in a different place on the spectrum than anyone I know but Moon's son has autism and the character feels real. It is told mostly in first person from his perspective. Even if inaccurate, I found myself thinking from this perspective for at least a few minutes after each reading session.
It doesn't happen often that I give a book 5 stars. To be really fair, this book warrants 4.5, not 5, but because of GR's system, I will round it up to 5.
If you want to know what it means to have autism, read this book.
Moon has some experience with autism, through her son. It shows in this book. As an autistic (Asperger Syndrome, high functioning) woman myself, I found the main character Lou Arrendale, very relatable. His story is told through first person perspective, and his way of thinking and the impact of the world on his person, his well-being is very accurate for, I think, most autistic persons. Autism in women is somewhat different from autism in men, but the core principles remain the same, and Moon managed to write a very true-ringing high functioning autistic person.
Aside from the wonderful viewpoint, it is a great …
It doesn't happen often that I give a book 5 stars. To be really fair, this book warrants 4.5, not 5, but because of GR's system, I will round it up to 5.
If you want to know what it means to have autism, read this book.
Moon has some experience with autism, through her son. It shows in this book. As an autistic (Asperger Syndrome, high functioning) woman myself, I found the main character Lou Arrendale, very relatable. His story is told through first person perspective, and his way of thinking and the impact of the world on his person, his well-being is very accurate for, I think, most autistic persons. Autism in women is somewhat different from autism in men, but the core principles remain the same, and Moon managed to write a very true-ringing high functioning autistic person.
Aside from the wonderful viewpoint, it is a great book about a moral dilemma: if there were an (experimental) cure for autism, should people with autism be pressured into taking it? Is it wrong to have a cure, but choosing not to take it, when you have a disability?
This book is mostly a character-driven story. There is some plot, but aside from the moral question, it isn't really about the plot. It is classified as sci-fi, because space and lightspeed/darkspeed is mentioned and in the end, Lou ends up in space, but I would rather call it "speculative fiction".
The end of the story causes the story to lose half a star. I feel a bit divided about it. As a person with autism, I naturally wanted the story to be: "Having autism is OK, and not taking the fix is OK because it is OK to accept who you are, disabled or not." And I wanted Lou not to take the fix and turn out to be OK. If I would have wanted him to take the cure, it would mean that I feel that I'm not OK, that I'm broken and need to be fixed, even if it may cost me my very self. That was very difficult to read, and at first made me a bit angry with the book. However, I can see that it works for the book. It wasn't a hasty decision. The morality of the question fills the entire book, and I think Elizabeth Moon deals very ethically with it. She covers the pro's and cons, and in the end, I do understand Lou's arguments to go through with it. For love.... yes, I would very probably make the same decision. But still, it make me very uncomfortable, even though I in my younger years I have often wished I could be cured.
Lou's wish to go to space is a bit strange. It doesn't really play an significant role in the rest of the book. Bringing it up in the last part of the book feels very contrived, as if she had to find a way to justify the sci-fi categorization.
Anyways, great book, really terrific yet fairly light, so go read!
The firs person hero is too well adjusted. He is autistic but so well trained he hardly makes any social mistakes. He does freeze when under pressure but he is almost perfectly trained to act properly in social circumstances. Some of his coworkers are more damaged, but our protagonist is too perfect.
The problem is that half the book is made up of someone saying something and then Lew explaining how he things it means one thing but he's been taught it actually means another.
It never stops!
The villains are the worst, I would be ashamed to portray such characters in children's cartoons.
If you want to read a better book abut Autism, try [b:The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time|1618|The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time|Mark Haddon|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327882682s/1618.jpg|4259809].
