The Weight of Ink

The greatest curse, he thought, was to be stuck in one's own time, and the greatest power was to see beyond its horizons.

This was....a book. It's an ambitious project involving two very separate time periods: Ester in 1660s London, and Helen and Aaron in the present day uncovering historical documents she scribed for a rabbi and her own documents she penned later on. The book flips between the two time periods, mostly using Ester's letters and documents as transition pieces. As you read about Helen and Aaron trying to secure the historical documents for their own review and notoriety against the college they work for, you also get Ester's story of being a woman with educational aspirations in a period where that was unnatural.

I approached this book with very little knowledge of the subject of the Jewish community in London, and a basic working knowledge of London history during the time period. I left the book with....not a whole lot more. The book appears to be well researched, but not a lot in the way of context or explanation is provided for the historical sections. I did some research on the side, but most of the characters mentioned in London were fictional (as is noted in the notes at the end of the book). I found myself getting a bit lost in some parts concerning very specific Jewish culture and history concepts, and I feel like the author had ample opportunity to provide some context (particularly in the present day parts) but didn't.

I also felt like the book was just...too much. At north of 600 pages, the book is very wordy for the stories that were told and could have used a bit of an edit. Both 1660s Ester and present day Helen/Aaron's stories are relatively complex (certainly much more than, "and here's what the next letter has to say"), and because of that it feels like neither story was handled with care, and the ending(s) felt rushed. The writing style is extremely wordy, full of metaphors and flowery language that sort of hid the story's thread in parts rather than enhanced it.

I found it a difficult read, and a lengthy one as well. The concept of uncovering documents and reading about a woman scribe in the 1660s was appealing, but I think the execution fell a little flat for me.

I was one of the 2 people in our book club who didn't think this is the best book since sliced bread. It was okay. There were really 2 stories they were both kind of interesting in their own right, and though they were related, they really weren't connected. The jumping back and forth between the 2 was trying. The one Devon I'm positive I got from the book was an interest in Spinoza; he was a fascinating and deep scientist and philosopher, although the book really didn't go into that much… He was, unfortunately, misplaced in time!
But back to the book: it was too wordy, and there were times when the words got in the way of the story. It was an okay book, but I would not go out of my way for it. It was particularly hard for me to get into it. I listened to it as opposed to "READ reading" it, and when I started it, I ended up not paying much attention to it. When I got halfway through the 1st of the 3 sections and was totally lost, I realized I had to pay attention, so I went back and started over. I thought that maybe I just didn't like it because I wasn't paying attention. Upon reading listening, I realized that I wasn't paying attention because I didn't care for it, not the other way around. But I did go through the whole thing (it's a LONG book, about 22 hours listening) paying attention the whole time.