The Last Days of New Paris: A Novel

209 pages

Published Aug. 9, 2016 by Del Rey.

ISBN:
978-0-345-54400-1
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

(21 reviews)

"A thriller of war that never was--of survival in an impossible city--of surreal cataclysm. In The Last Days of New Paris, China Mieville entwines true historical events and people with his daring, uniquely imaginative brand of fiction, reconfiguring history and art into something new. "Beauty will be convulsive." 1941. In the chaos of wartime Marseille, American engineer--and occult disciple--Jack Parsons stumbles onto a clandestine anti-Nazi group, including Surrealist theorist Andre Breton. In the strange games of the dissident diplomats, exiled revolutionaries, and avant-garde artists, Parsons finds and channels hope. But what he unwittingly unleashes is the power of dreams and nightmares, changing the war and the world forever. 1950. A lone Surrealist fighter, Thibaut, walks a new, hallucinogenic Paris, where Nazis and the Resistance are trapped in unending conflict, and the streets are stalked by living images and texts--and by the forces of Hell. To escape the city, he must …

4 editions

Review of 'The last days of new Paris' on 'Goodreads'

This was quite an interesting ride. I was not too familiar with Surrealist art, but gained a deeper appreciation of it thanks to this novella. I also appreciated its length since a much longer novel would have been exhausting with all the craziness that takes place. The characters were decent, but the main selling point was New Paris and the unique setting were art and devils roam the streets alongside Nazis and resistance fighters. While not my favorite Mieville story, this is in line with the weird fiction he is known for.

For a full review, check out my blog: strakul.blogspot.com/2020/08/book-review-last-days-of-new-paris-by.html

Review of 'The Last Days of New Paris: A Novel' on 'Goodreads'

This is a little opaque unless you're REALLY hardcore about surrealist art, but being a Miéville book, it's not like it's bad or anything. I think it suffers from being what it is, which is to say, an attempt to cram as many art references as possible into a story and have it still resemble some kind of coherent(?) narrative. A fairly typical Miéville stunt, actually, building a whole world around one basic conceit -- just not one especially meaningful to me. I'm very sure that this has its audience, and for their sakes I am glad it exists.

avatar for hyrrokkin

rated it

avatar for reverse

rated it

avatar for datwizzerd

rated it

avatar for froderik

rated it

avatar for nic

rated it

avatar for Smoak

rated it

avatar for flatlined

rated it

avatar for shawn

rated it

avatar for armamix@books.infosec.exchange

rated it

avatar for mad_frisbeterian

rated it

avatar for caasn

rated it

avatar for mrkvm

rated it

avatar for Gretrascis

rated it

avatar for flatlined

rated it

avatar for jjackunrau

rated it

avatar for thatch_bamblebrush

rated it

avatar for willhopkins

rated it