torin reviewed On the origin of species by Charles Darwin
Review of 'On the origin of species' on 'Goodreads'
5 stars
I tried to read On the Origin of Species a few times in the last decade, but got bored or bogged down and quit. This edition, however, kept me going. The context and extension provided by the letters, journal entries, autobiography snippets, and incredible illustrations made formerly tedious passages fascinating and drew me into parts of the text I may have skimmed over otherwise. I was constantly gasping at the way a single paragraph or aside now represents entire scientific sub-fields. Darwin may not have been the first to propose natural selection or descent with modification, but he had incredible insight into what it meant.
The excerpts from letters, etc. also humanized Darwin - glimpses of his personality, foibles, struggles, humor, admiration of handsome young men - revealed through his own personal writing made me less intimidated by his work and able to engage with it critically, delightedly, warmly. …
I tried to read On the Origin of Species a few times in the last decade, but got bored or bogged down and quit. This edition, however, kept me going. The context and extension provided by the letters, journal entries, autobiography snippets, and incredible illustrations made formerly tedious passages fascinating and drew me into parts of the text I may have skimmed over otherwise. I was constantly gasping at the way a single paragraph or aside now represents entire scientific sub-fields. Darwin may not have been the first to propose natural selection or descent with modification, but he had incredible insight into what it meant.
The excerpts from letters, etc. also humanized Darwin - glimpses of his personality, foibles, struggles, humor, admiration of handsome young men - revealed through his own personal writing made me less intimidated by his work and able to engage with it critically, delightedly, warmly. And it gave me more confidence as a scholar - we all struggle, have bad days, get things wrong, and fuss too much over details that probably don't matter.
I also connected with his descriptions of the way his poor health influenced how he lived his life. He came to see it, in some ways, as supporting his scholarly work. This was a revelation for me as I have seen my own illness primarily as a barrier to scientific work, or work of any kind. And while this may be true of academia, I begin to see glimmers of possibility elsewhere.