Better Than Before: Mastering the Habits of Our Everyday Lives

No cover

Gretchen Rubin: Better Than Before: Mastering the Habits of Our Everyday Lives (2015, Crown)

Published Jan. 24, 2015 by Crown.

View on OpenLibrary

4 stars (2 reviews)

1 edition

Review of 'Better Than Before: Mastering the Habits of Our Everyday Lives' on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

Reviewers of Gretchen Rubin's books tend to fall into one of two categories: those who like her and those who don't. Given her mania for categorization, this is a distinction that Rubin herself might appreciate. However, it seems all too often that evaluation of the book never progresses beyond a visceral reaction to the author's personality. Personally, I find her self-assured epigrammatic style rather engaging, although others sometimes view her as a condescending know-it-all.

Perhaps, therefore, it is no accident that Ms. Rubin's favorite author is Samuel Johnson, the biggest know-it-all in the English language. Johnson is saved from being completely insufferable by wit and insight, and one might well say the same of Ms. Rubin. Her behavioral categorizations — criticized by some with a sniff as "unscientific" — are nevertheless a useful heuristic for separating different kinds of personalities. And Ms. Rubin's observation that when it comes to habits, …

Review of 'Better Than Before: Mastering the Habits of Our Everyday Lives' on 'Storygraph'

4 stars

I received an advance reader's edition from Read it Forward.

I'm not a regular reader of self-help books, and this is also the first book of Gretchen Rubin's that I've read, but this book provided some great insight into how I form my own habits. I loved how everything was broken down into categories and titles (I'm a Questioner!) and the author's anecdotes, both personal and from other people, made it a fun read while I was thinking about how to incorporate this advice into my own life.

Some parts felt a little heavy-handed (I respect the author's decision about switching to a low-carb diet, but I don't think it needed to be reiterated so much), and I feel that footnotes may have worked better than referring to "studies" from the Notes section at the end of the book, but overall I'm already seeing some changes in how I view …