mikerickson reviewed Freakonomics by Stephen J. Dubner
-
2 stars
I was lured in with the promise of a fun, accessible pop-psychology spin on economics in our daily lives. Instead I got an oddly masturbatory criminology lecture hyperfocused on poor black people and everything they do wrong.
Damn near every weekend I find myself in a thrift store and this book specifically appears in droves pretty much everywhere I go. The frequency with which I see this book finally won me over and I gave it a chance. Originally published in 2005, I was curious what a book about economics right on the verge of the 2008 financial crisis would look like. Turns out I'm still wondering what that book would look like, because this one wasn't about economics at all!
There are discussions on "how is the Ku Klux Klan like a group of real-estate agents?," how people become crack dealers, and whether or not children given stereotypical black …
I was lured in with the promise of a fun, accessible pop-psychology spin on economics in our daily lives. Instead I got an oddly masturbatory criminology lecture hyperfocused on poor black people and everything they do wrong.
Damn near every weekend I find myself in a thrift store and this book specifically appears in droves pretty much everywhere I go. The frequency with which I see this book finally won me over and I gave it a chance. Originally published in 2005, I was curious what a book about economics right on the verge of the 2008 financial crisis would look like. Turns out I'm still wondering what that book would look like, because this one wasn't about economics at all!
There are discussions on "how is the Ku Klux Klan like a group of real-estate agents?," how people become crack dealers, and whether or not children given stereotypical black names will have a harder time succeeding financially. The book admits up front that there is no central unifying theme of the chapters that read like completely separate essays, so at least that was honest. But before each of these chapters are snippets from various newspaper articles (again, this is a fairly dated book by now) blowing air up the author's ass about how he isn't afraid to speak his mind, etc., etc. that I could've done without.
I don't know. Not what I was expecting going into it and what it ended up being wasn't compelling enough to make for an enjoyable read.