Back
Joan Didion: Slouching Towards Bethlehem: Essays (2008, Farrar, Straus and Giroux) 4 stars

Review of 'Slouching Towards Bethlehem: Essays' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

The first section of this collection of Didion's essays read to me like breezy, if intelligent, essays of very little consequence. I'll be honest, I wasn't quite bowled over by them. Then I kept reading. I can only describe the experience as intellectually thrilling. Didion is a masterful writer and the way she points her mind at subjects small and large is overwhelming. Just take the end of her essay On Morality and see how insightful it is for our current (November 10th, 2020) circumstances, politically:

You see I want to be quite obstinate about insisting that we have no way of knowing-beyond that fundamental loyalty to the social code what is "right" and what is "wrong," what is "good" and what is "evil." I dwell so upon this because the most disturbing aspect of "morality" seems to me to be the frequency with which the word now appears; in the press, on television, in the most perfunctory kinds of conversation. Questions of straightforward power (or survival) politics, questions of quite indifferent public policy, questions of almost anything: they are all assigned these factitious moral burdens. There is something facile going on, some self-indulgence at work. Of course we would all like to "believe" in something, like to assuage our private guilts in public causes, like to lose our tiresome selves; like, perhaps, to transform the white flag of defeat at home into the brave white banner of battle away from home. And of course it is all right to do that; that is how, immemorially, things have gotten done. But I think it is all right only so long as we do not delude ourselves about what we are doing, and why. It is all right only so long as we remember that all the ad hoc committees, all the picket lines, all the brave signatures in The New York Times, all the tools of agitprop straight across the spectrum, do not confer upon anyone any ipso facto virtue. It is all right only so long as we recognize that the end may or may not be expedient, may or may not be a good idea, but in any case has nothing to do with "morality." Because when we start deceiving ourselves into thinking not that we want something or need something, not that it is a pragmatic necessity for us to have it, but that it is a moral imperative that we have it, then is when we join the fashionable madmen, and then is when the thin whine of hysteria is heard in the land, and then is when we are in bad trouble. And I suspect we are already there.


I suspect she was right in 1965 and we're still dealing with the generative consequences.

A necessary read for any student of writing but probably consequential for anyone grappling with our current political times.