User Profile

Jeff Lilly

JeffLilly@bookwyrm.social

Joined 2 years, 9 months ago

Linguist, author, Druid. Research scientist, lover of fantasy, SF, language, history, hiking, and nature. “Instead of conceiving ourselves separate, exalted, exceptional overlords of creation, we must perceive our part in an ecological community, and seek to be in compassionate, full relationship with every bee, rock, particle, and hurricane.”

This link opens in a pop-up window

Ryan North, Ryan North: How to Invent Everything (Paperback, 2019, Riverhead Books)

The only book you need if you're going back in time

What would you do …

Review of 'How to Invent Everything' on 'Goodreads'

While this book was really informative and entertaining, and I'll definitely be using it for worldbuilding reference, there are a few things that kept me from giving it five stars:
* The jokes got a little repetitive. But if you spread out the reading over a few months this is fine.
* There is precious little social science, which I thought was a pretty glaring omission considering North's training in linguistics. Where is the advice about how to build coherent, healthy societies and families? How to prevent income disparities and provide universal education? We're trying to build a civilization here!
* Some of the science he includes is out of date, or reflects commonly held assumptions instead of the latest research. For example, he suggests that farming is essential to prevent famine and reduce the amount of time you have to spend gathering food, but really a better way to …

Review of 'Antonyms in English' on 'Goodreads'

Excellent book. It surveys the current state of research quickly and thoroughly, and makes it clear that antonym research is both very difficult and very important. There are several different ways to approach the research, and it’s rather like trying to explore the ocean with radar: some things come through clearly, others are hazy, and most of it remains mysterious. The book lands on an analysis I basically agree with, but the proposal (the idea of an Antonym Construction that is only lexical, with no syntactic or surface ordering information) is bold, and I think has a lot of theoretical implications. I think construction grammars already have a problem of “overgenerating” possible linguistic expressions (i.e., they are good at describing observed languages, but would also be good at describing languages that are not observed) and lexical-only constructions would only make that problem worse.