Kyle R. Conway started reading Nature of Code by Daniel Shiffman
Nature of Code by Daniel Shiffman
What if you could re-create the awe-inspiring flocking patterns of birds or the hypnotic dance of fireflies—with code? For over …
I like tea, and I'm bad at summarizing myself.
This link opens in a pop-up window
What if you could re-create the awe-inspiring flocking patterns of birds or the hypnotic dance of fireflies—with code? For over …
With the power and versatility of the Inkscape software, making charts, diagrams, illustrations, and UI mockups with infinite resolution becomes …
I just finished this last night. If I get my thoughts about me, I'll write up my thoughts more completely, but to start, I'll just say: What a lovely book! To quote the author, it is a "female text". Undoubtedly true. It's also such a human text, full of 21st century struggles, longings, obsessions, and quiet successes as well as the same very human struggles, longings, obsessions, and quiet successes of people who lived and died hundreds of years ago.
In one sense, it's in the same universe topically as Jenny Odell's "Saving Time: Discovering a Life Beyond the Clock," a personal story of sorts that, in the end, has an immense warping effect on your perception of time ― both your own and everyone/thing else's.
In this book, the ghost is not only known ― a specific person ― but sought after. Where evidence is lacking in the historical …
I just finished this last night. If I get my thoughts about me, I'll write up my thoughts more completely, but to start, I'll just say: What a lovely book! To quote the author, it is a "female text". Undoubtedly true. It's also such a human text, full of 21st century struggles, longings, obsessions, and quiet successes as well as the same very human struggles, longings, obsessions, and quiet successes of people who lived and died hundreds of years ago.
In one sense, it's in the same universe topically as Jenny Odell's "Saving Time: Discovering a Life Beyond the Clock," a personal story of sorts that, in the end, has an immense warping effect on your perception of time ― both your own and everyone/thing else's.
In this book, the ghost is not only known ― a specific person ― but sought after. Where evidence is lacking in the historical record (and it is sadly lacking), imagination conspires with like personal circumstances to conjure an image which is undoubtedly wrong, but truer for the telling anyway.
Our author heroine upturns every stone for generations and finds little to grasp onto about the ghost. There are too few facts to attach to our spectre to literally "flesh" them out. As our writer wants so badly to tell us about the person and... can't. It's not on the tip of her tongue ― it's unknown and unknowable. Desire can't reveal the ghost to us. Our author wants to speak of the ghost with certainty, but is unable to.
In the end, the ghost speaks for herself via the poem/keen for her fallen husband: Lament for Art Ó Laoghaire in a new translation by our author/hero.
Reading this poem, the words of our ghost, after longing along with our author and tagging along to graveyards and libraries, imagining her daily life as a child, mother, sister, daughter, grandmother, lover, and person ― along with all the people she loved and who loved her ― we're left with such a profound resonance that echoes and reflects across time itself.
Recommended.
It's really good. When I feel compelled to send the entire 1st page of the 1st chapter to a friend who works in a non-profit because it says in one page what his career is about, it's a pretty special thing.
It's also a nice view that doesn't pull punches about who is to blame, and the book somehow seems apolitical in the sense of American parties, because both of them are terrible.
So far, this book is the answer I've always wanted when hearing the results from yet another study on poverty by a researcher stuck in a Cassandra-like cycle of doing the same study over and over again, with the same results. This book is a bit mad, but it still has the data, and it's a bit disappointed.
Very much enjoying.
A few chapters in and this one feels more, I don't know, substantial (?) than "How to Do Nothing" -- which I enjoyed. There's probably something to do with reading this alongside "Poverty, by America" that's also influencing the depth I'm sensing here, but it's more than a meditation on "time" -- more of an interrogation of the history of time as a social construct. Some of the quotes and other tales unearthed (at least to me) such as the radius of the sound of a bell, and other wonderful oddities packed together so closely truly give rise to a deep and unsettling (but somehow calming) realization of what has been taken from us all (literally time, but not just the thing itself, but a more human conceptualization of the thing -- time -- itself.)
Paired with the book on Poverty, all of the cuts toward capitalism are deeper …
A few chapters in and this one feels more, I don't know, substantial (?) than "How to Do Nothing" -- which I enjoyed. There's probably something to do with reading this alongside "Poverty, by America" that's also influencing the depth I'm sensing here, but it's more than a meditation on "time" -- more of an interrogation of the history of time as a social construct. Some of the quotes and other tales unearthed (at least to me) such as the radius of the sound of a bell, and other wonderful oddities packed together so closely truly give rise to a deep and unsettling (but somehow calming) realization of what has been taken from us all (literally time, but not just the thing itself, but a more human conceptualization of the thing -- time -- itself.)
Paired with the book on Poverty, all of the cuts toward capitalism are deeper -- it stings worse.
Loving.
I've no idea what to call this genre of book (and I don't remember when I read it, only knowing that it was during a time in the pandemic when social distancing was still a thing visible portions of communities did and mostly people were wearing masks). In any case, it was the type of book I needed at the time.