User Profile

Dee

StavroginsWorm@bookwyrm.social

Joined 11 months, 2 weeks ago

This link opens in a pop-up window

2024 Reading Goal

54% complete! Dee has read 41 of 75 books.

reviewed Religio medici by Thomas Browne

Thomas Browne: Religio medici (1862, Ticknor and Fields) 5 stars

5/5

5 stars

‘As for those wingy Mysteries in Divinity, and airy subtleties in Religion, which have unhing'd the brains of better heads, they never stretched the Pia Mater of mine.‘

This 17th century anatomically-informed humblebrag might be my favourite sentence read this year.

Browne’s writing reminds me of Arthur Conan Doyle’s character ‘John Smith.’ Particularly due to the playful and curious approach to the world/god/nature, paired with the writing style of a rambling (but sagacious) old man… A worthwhile read.

Leo Tolstoy: The Devil (2004, Kessinger Publishing, Kessinger Publishing, LLC) 4 stars

This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the original. Due to its age, …

Imagine the Kreutzer Sonata, but this time he gets it right.

5 stars

I’m left with an inexplicable feeling of (second-hand) self-disgust and discomfort from something so simply written…

Sophie Herxheimer: Velkom to Inklandt (2021, Short Books, Limited) 2 stars

Awful

2 stars

Possibly one of the worst books I’ve read this year. Poems make up less than half the book’s pages, some with gargantuan fonts that just so coincidentally add a few pages numbers…

A lot of these poems also completely rely on the broken English format to save them from being instantly labelled as bland/rejected. There’s not much substance.

Fyodor Dostoevsky: The Brothers Karamazov (Hardcover, 1996, Modern Library) 4 stars

The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoevsky’s crowning achievement, is a tale of patricide and family rivalry that …

5/5

5 stars

Uncertain where to start with this one. I could copy paste a synopsis of the Book of Job and then claim the bible would have been better if written by Dostoevsky, but perhaps I shall instead attempt a review (except really it is an informal microessay on his reused themes…..)

This is one of the few books left in the ‘vesky corpus as first reads… I do not enjoy this fact and have been rereading each chapter of this for months and have morphed into the Pepe Silvia image.

In a way, this book was a quilt of the major themes of most of Dostoevsky’s preceding works—amplified. Childhood feels more potent a theme here than in ‘A Raw Youth/The Adolescent,’ which itself continued on from Dostoevsky’s experimentation with this in demons and Stavrogin’s upbringing—i.e., the Q of what shapes a man’s morals before he can even be considered a man? …