User Profile

bwthelines

bwthelines@bookwyrm.social

Joined 1 year, 11 months ago

This link opens in a pop-up window

The office bearers of the organisations affiliated to the Sangh, who are respected and famous, are all Savarna Hindus while those who die in riots fomented by them are all Dalits and Backward Castes. The Bania seth sits comfortably in his shop, the Brahmin pandit holds forth on spirituality in the temple, while those who are pushed out to die are Dalits and Adivasis and Backward Castes. If they cannot understand this simple fact, how foolish are they?

I Could Not Be Hindu by  (Page 178)

The true story of how RSS manipulates Dalits and Backward Castes

An inside look at the fascist organisation, the RSS’ insidious agenda and intricate working. The organisation is exposed in this book as one with not only a genocidal, but a casteist working mechanism. To readers of political ideology and political sciences in India, this may not be a new phenomenon. However, the authors narrative style lens credibility to something that has often been repeated in press, and in publication about the RSS.- that it capitalises on the discontent of the dispirited Indian Hindus by brainwashing them with a fascist ideology.

The author lives a life which is diverse in its experience, ranging from working as an RSS member to a social activist with interest in publication against the RSS. However, his caste follows him and it is appalling to see how obstructive it can really be to affecting any real social change as a citizen of India.

I I didn’t …

On the chapter that seemingly marks the turning point for the author's journey with the RSS. It reads like a horror story in many places, albeit one that people will find familiar if cognisant with the Hindutva ideology's way of roping in discontented men and women from all parts of India. Which is not to say it does not add the necessary detail for an inside look at the RSS.

finished reading Animal Intimacies by Radhika Govindrajan

Radhika Govindrajan: Animal Intimacies (Hardcover, 2018, University of Chicago Press)

This book is a brilliant work of ethnography, based on the author, Radhika Govindrajan's field work in rural Uttarakhand (a state in India). It is very effective in capturing the politics and different perspectives of interspecies relationships which she portrays both with academic rigour and with a narrative style that makes this work truly appeasing to read.

It is grounded in feminist and postcolonial thinking, which captures the history, legality, and various modern cross-sections of the anthropological subject (i.e human beings) with their different animal counterparts in an Indian setting. The author also constructs a very beautiful vocabulary which can be useful for people looking to verbalise their perception of multispecies affection, I certainly did. Here, the author extends the boundaries of man-animal relations beyond the oft-narrated conflict in the anthropomorphic era, by adding radical feminist, anti-caste and political perspectives to a work of anthropology