User Profile

Alecs Ștefănescu

catileptic@bookwyrm.social

Joined 1 year, 8 months ago

i'm an activist thriving on layers and layers of affinity for shades of nuance. i have a life-long love for the Weird / Uncanny / Unheimlich.

chaos.social/@catileptic

This link opens in a pop-up window

Alecs Ștefănescu's books

Currently Reading (View all 17)

2026 Reading Goal

Alecs Ștefănescu has read 0 of 12 books.

Roland Barthes: The Pleasure of the Text (1975)

The Pleasure of the Text (French: Le Plaisir du Texte) is a 1973 book by …

The most tender gossip

Barthes writes about "the text" as a universe of writing, reading, acting the text out, critiquing the text, paying homage, and, particularly important, enjoying. A lot of small moments where other texts are being discussed require one to not only have already read them, but also to be aware of some of the critique that surrounds them. A lot of those small moments of delight were unreachable, to me. However, what there is plenty of, what doesn't require context, is Barthes' tender gossip about all the ways in which writing delights, moves, reveals. Becoming enmeshed with textual production and consumption brings one in full contact with the full spectrum of politics, from the most demagogical to the most direct representation of will.

All in all, a dense and pleasurable read.

Eva Illouz: Cold Intimacies (Undetermined language, 2006, POLITY PRESS)

It is commonly assumed that capitalism has created an a-emotional world dominated by bureaucratic rationality; …

And here Arditi offers a very interesting idea, namely that social distance derives not from the absence of common traits, but from the abstract nature of these traits. Remoteness, that is, does not set in because people have nothing in common, but because the things they have in common are, or have become, too common. To put this slightly differently, I would suggest that remoteness derives from the fact that people now share a common and highly standardized language.

[...]

Conversely, closeness results from the specificity and exclusivity of similarities shared between two entities. In this sense, nearness implies the sharing of “existentially generated meanings.” It is, in other words, the fact that, to an increasing degree, we have cultural techniques to standardize intimate relationships, to talk about them and manage them in a generalized way, which weakens our capacity for nearness, the congruence between subject and object.

Cold Intimacies by