Back
Jon Krakauer: Into the wild (1997, Anchor Books) 4 stars

In April 1992 a young man from a well-to-do family hitchhiked to Alaska and walked …

Review of 'Into the wild' on 'Goodreads'

1 star

This is a book I would definitely NEVER have picked up or signed up for a ring for on my own. Unfortunately, this book only reminded me of why that is and has reinforced my disinterest in reading books of this similar vein. Why is that for me? I have to relate to something in the book. I did not care for the author, nor did I relate at all to the subject of the book. I found both had a position in life that is not how I am. Both are intelligent men who had a thirst for adventure. I can understand that. However, their attitudes and personalities as depicted are much of a turn-off to me. I do not think I could ever have a conversation with either of them.

The writing is interesting and I do like how Mr. Karkauer circles around. You know from the outset what happens to Chris McCandless. The story starts and ends there, and comes back there many times in between. You learn about Chris's and Krakauer's journeys.

I won't go into exactly what I didn't like about McCandless, because that is somewhat pointless. However, as someone who attended religious schools for 12 years, I will say I know how to spot a Jesus-character and he certainly was one. If he had lived through his adventure, it sounds like he would have continued in the more stable bits of a Jesus-life. However, he had the family abandonment and searching for something better aspect going strong for the part of his life this book focuses on.