Reviews and Comments

johanna

johanna@bookwyrm.social

Joined 2 years, 4 months ago

This link opens in a pop-up window

reviewed 2061: Odyssey Three by Arthur C. Clarke (Odyssey #3)

Arthur C. Clarke: 2061 (Paperback, 1988, Grafton) 3 stars

A re-visitation of the imaginative future painted by Arthur C. Clarke in his previous two …

a mixed bag

3 stars

Content warning spoiler

Arthur C. Clarke: 2010 (1982, Phantasia Press) 4 stars

When 2001: A Space Odyssey first shocked, amazed, and delighted millions in the late 1960s, …

i learned a lot about moons

4 stars

I thought this book was more beautifully written than the first! The poetic and somewhat detailed descriptions of celestial phenomena drew me in, as well as the rich cast of characters as seen from Floyds perspective.

I think there is a lot of horror to this series that I am not altogether sure was 100% intended to be viewed as such. Certainly some things are obviously meant to be scary and evoke loneliness etc, but nothing to me is sadder or more terrible than the thought and description of these Gods and their impact on our creation and lives, as well as the direct influence on Bowman, who is little more than a tool for most of the book. Very depressing!

I really loved the descriptions of the evolved life on Europa in the last chapter. So fascinating and fun to think about; I don't think I can name another …

Arthur C. Clarke: 2010 (1982, Phantasia Press) 4 stars

When 2001: A Space Odyssey first shocked, amazed, and delighted millions in the late 1960s, …

This made me really appreciate the movie. That sounds like it sucked which it definitely didn't but some details about the movie were obviously added and my God were they good additions. Especially the scene in the movie where Hal asks if he will dream. Shocking honestly, that that wasnt even in the book

reviewed 2001: A Space Odyssey by Arthur C. Clarke (1st ed.)

Arthur C. Clarke: 2001 (Hardcover, 1968, New American Library) 4 stars

Based on a screenplay by Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke.

gonna buy it physically too

4 stars

Some things are different from the movie but there are only maybe one or two scenes that I definitely preferred in the movie over the book. While I didn't feel like I needed a more detailed explanation of some of the mysteries in the story, I can definitely say that the book can keep your interest better than a lot of silent scenes with beautiful effects might.

For me it's not really a matter of "the movie is better" or "the book is better"; I am just thankful for some of the extra content and descriptions in the book. It's like an add-on. I think without the film the book wouldn't be so good. I might have cried while reading this. Leave me alone..

finished reading 2001: A Space Odyssey by Arthur C. Clarke (1st ed.)

Arthur C. Clarke: 2001 (Hardcover, 1968, New American Library) 4 stars

Based on a screenplay by Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke.

It was a secret that, with the greatest determination, was very hard to conceal - for it affected one's attitude, one's voice, one's total outlook on the universe. Therefore it was best that Poole and Bowman, who would be on all the TV screens in the world during the first weeks of the flight, should not learn the mission's full purpose, until there was need to know. So ran the logic of the planners; but their twin gods of Security and National Interest meant nothing to Hal. He was only aware of the conflict that was slowly destroying his integrity - the conflict between truth, and concealment of truth. He had begun to make mistakes, although, like a neurotic who could not observe his own symptoms, he would have denied it. The link with Earth, over which his performance was continually monitored, had become the voice of a conscience he …

Stanisław Lem: The Invincible (1972, Sidgwick and Jackson) 4 stars

Reads initially like the sort of traditional science fiction you might see on TV - …

It started out lovely with all the detailed descriptions and I really appreciated the details on "futuristic" technology. Then at some point I became very bored and tired because of these descriptions. I think this is largely owed to the German translation and the length and structure of the sentences being needlessly complex.

I think this book is lovely so far and I appreciate how very science this science fiction is. It feels less dreamy or at lesst what is dreamy about it is so in the same way that real science is poetic. I'm keen to find out more about this planet and its mystery