User Profile

left_adjoint

left_adjoint@bookwyrm.social

Joined 1 year, 11 months ago

This link opens in a pop-up window

2025 Reading Goal

92% complete! left_adjoint has read 37 of 40 books.

Christopher Brown: Natural History of Empty Lots (2024, Timber Press, Incorporated)

During the real estate crash of the late 2000s, Christopher Brown purchased an empty lot …

Ehhh?

It's...hrmm

I don't know

I think this is a book for drivers. I mean people who never walk places, never have stared out a bus window, who are used to going from home to business or park without any other experience of the outside world.

I think if you're that kind of person this might be really really good in terms of opening your eyes to a lot of things

But, but, this book felt weirdly unedited too because there were so many parts that, like I said earlier, made me go "didn't I already read this part??" and no it's just that he repeats himself A Lot

and the book itself feels very meandering like it was a series of blog posts not really meant to be read as a book but rather just a bunch of loosely themed diary-in-retrospect entries

Christopher Brown: Natural History of Empty Lots (2024, Timber Press, Incorporated)

During the real estate crash of the late 2000s, Christopher Brown purchased an empty lot …

I feel bad that I think there's interesting bits of this book but a lot of it is just is just a miss for me, it feels very unedited and repetitive where I keep finding myself reading a sentence and thinking "wait, I already read this part...no it's just almost the identical text"

Scott Westerfeld, Keith Thompson: Goliath (Paperback, 2012, Simon Pulse)

Content warning spoilings

commented on Leviathan by Scott Westerfeld (Leviathan, #1)

Scott Westerfeld: Leviathan (2009)

Leviathan is a 2009 novel written by Scott Westerfeld and illustrated by Keith Thompson. First …

Still enjoying it! Fun breezy read, nice change of pace from what I've been reading lately

Sheila Jasanoff: The Ethics of Invention (2016)

Yeah I'm having some complicated feelings about the argument of this book so far

Like yes I agree that technological progress is often done by private entities in an undemocratic way

Yes I agree that regulatory agencies often take too narrow a view of risk and harm

But, I don't know, it feels like she's kind of arguing that to even develop technology we need a kind of consensus first that has looked at all possible potential harms and

I don't know

that doesn't really sit right with me. Maybe this is because of how trans I am but like I very easily see how this argument can, and in some ways has, been used to try and take away our healthcare as "harmful experiments"

and it doesn't help that she already has characterized nuclear plants as unequivocally dangerous

so I don't …