Erik L. Midtsveen 🏳️⚧️🇳🇴 started reading Beyond good and evil by Friedrich Nietzsche (Penguin classics)

Anarcho-syndicalist. non-binary person. they/them, also bisexual.
This link opens in a pop-up window
Success! Erik L. Midtsveen 🏳️⚧️🇳🇴 has read 5 of 5 books.
Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None (German: Also sprach Zarathustra: Ein Buch für Alle und Keinen, also …
God and the State (called by its author The Historical Sophisms of the Doctrinaire School of Communism) is an …
Mastodon @midtsveen@social.linux.pizza
The Conquest of Bread is Peter Kropotkin’s most extensive study of human needs and his outline of the most rational …
Paul Feyerabend argued for 'Epistemological Anarchism': that in order to do truly good science, one can't rule out alternative methods, ad hoc hypotheses, mythology, religion and wishful thinking. Using the example of Galileo, he shows how science's greatest strides are made by deliberately being "unscientific" in the way that court scientists tend to think nowadays.
Epistemological Anarchism is a total rejection of the so-called "demarcation problem": the attempt by early 20th century philosophers to distinguish "science" from other realms. It overturns the assumptions of logical positivism and returns us to the conception of knowledge held by antiquity, the scholastics, the Renaissance and everyone else: science can't rule out its perceived opponents by technicality or it would have also undermined the very "pseudoscientists" that developed us our scientific conceptions of today.
Paul Feyerabend argued for 'Epistemological Anarchism': that in order to do truly good science, one can't rule out alternative methods, ad hoc hypotheses, mythology, religion and wishful thinking. Using the example of Galileo, he shows how science's greatest strides are made by deliberately being "unscientific" in the way that court scientists tend to think nowadays.
Epistemological Anarchism is a total rejection of the so-called "demarcation problem": the attempt by early 20th century philosophers to distinguish "science" from other realms. It overturns the assumptions of logical positivism and returns us to the conception of knowledge held by antiquity, the scholastics, the Renaissance and everyone else: science can't rule out its perceived opponents by technicality or it would have also undermined the very "pseudoscientists" that developed us our scientific conceptions of today.
Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge is a 1975 book about the philosophy of science by Paul …
Around mid-2024, I bought this book and read about half of it, and I ended up finding and reading the rest through an alternative online platform in .pdf format. The cover is a pretty clear hint about where you might find a digital copy.
Around mid-2024, I bought this book and read about half of it, and I ended up finding and reading the rest through an alternative online platform in .pdf format. The cover is a pretty clear hint about where you might find a digital copy.