User Profile

A good very exhaustive record of the methods and motives of the ethnic cleansing project that began the Zionist project and particularly the Nakba. What is really interesting is how it exposes how both systematic and arbitrary the ethnic cleansing were. With long lists of those to be killed or at the very least driven out of their home including those who were for example minor local politicians while at the same time outside of the many intentionally targeted whether you are driven out of the country or just shot seemed to rely in a lot of villages on the whims of the local commander with neither option given censure by the nascent Israeli government. The book shows the absurdity of denying that the Israeli army had any other goal in its actions in 1948 other than a purposeful attempt to seize as much land as possible and to make sure as little of the natives remain in their newly claimed border as possible. A really good book I'd highly recommend to better understand the Nakba and the founding of the Israeli state.

In weapons of the weak James C Scott analyzes how the rise of capitalism and new technology has affected ideology between classes in a specific Malaysian village. A book I would recommend even though it meanders in mathematical details in the middle chapters and ends with a conclusion I find less then convincing. It's strength lies in its history from below approach and on how well it communicates what different intersecting groups think about the changes and how that affects both their actions and thoughts and how those often contradict. It's weakness comes primarily though not exclusively from one main point its main thesis that Scott tries to form from this interesting ethnography and that is a critique of the idea of cultural hegemony. Scott's argument boils down to the idea that although action makes appearance of cultural hegemony private thoughts often show this is just a practical move to survive within the system. A large section of the book focuses on the used strategy's of passive resistance such as evasion, sabotage and feigned ignorance. Another interesting idea is his argument that the cultural ideas allow room for the lower classes to us the dominant ideology to improve their lot in ways. The problems with this is Scott often overstates his proof and valorizes these passive resistance actions and seems to disdain more open revolt. He also seems to conflate erroneously in my view the way the lower classes can use the presentation of the dominant ideology to improve the reality with the idea that the dominant ideology isn't there to enforce the values that work for the rich. Despite these problems all in all it was an entertaining history from below book that shows well passive resistance though I think it suffers from Scott's thesis not following from the presented ethnography.