An interesting enough read, I suppose. In reading non-fiction I like to be able to discern an overarching thesis, and I like to be able to see how each chapter/section contributes to that thesis, or at least the narrative that supports that thesis. And I don't see that here the result being that I walk away from this book feeling like I've read a lot of stuff, but not learnt anything except that there was this book that caused a lot of trouble in Europe in the 15th century.