Lyden Orbase reviewed Frankenstein by Mary Shelley (Oxford World's Classics)
1818 Edition
3 stars
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is an epistolary novel, told through letters and diary entries.
The story unfolds in first-person narration from three perspectives: Walton, Victor Frankenstein, and the Creature.
Chapter lengths vary widely, ranging from brief to over twenty pages, and the pacing leans moderate to slow. One problem I had with this book was the agonizingly endless description of Rivers, flowers, rocks, mountain tops, And the weather. I don't see the point of telling it in that extensive length. It's not a book about hiking and nature appreciation after all.
It had a great idea for a sci-fi plot. The book is categorised as gothic horror but it didn't feel that way to me. Themes of loneliness, ambition, and revenge run throughout, with the Creature’s tragic arc leaving the strongest impression. There's also philosophical weight that goes with the plot.
The central focus is on Victor …
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is an epistolary novel, told through letters and diary entries.
The story unfolds in first-person narration from three perspectives: Walton, Victor Frankenstein, and the Creature.
Chapter lengths vary widely, ranging from brief to over twenty pages, and the pacing leans moderate to slow. One problem I had with this book was the agonizingly endless description of Rivers, flowers, rocks, mountain tops, And the weather. I don't see the point of telling it in that extensive length. It's not a book about hiking and nature appreciation after all.
It had a great idea for a sci-fi plot. The book is categorised as gothic horror but it didn't feel that way to me. Themes of loneliness, ambition, and revenge run throughout, with the Creature’s tragic arc leaving the strongest impression. There's also philosophical weight that goes with the plot.
The central focus is on Victor and his Creature. Ironically, the most compelling character is the one who isn’t human. The Creature is written with striking emotional depth, while Elizabeth Lavenza feels underdeveloped by comparison.
I read the original 1818 edition and i’m curious to see what changes the revised edition has to offer.