Philosophy as Practice
4 stars
This is a great introduction to philosophy as a practice. I was a bit concerned that it would be overly academic, but I was pleased that this wasn’t the case. When I read the table of contents, I thought that the text may be segmented by disciple: “philosophy of mind,” “logic,” “epistemology,” “ethics,” and so on.
Instead, Blackburn approaches larger themes and questions that philosophers ask. Then, he dives into perspectives that different thinkers take, while explaining their arguments to us. He seems charitable toward to most arguments, although Blackburn doesn’t seem at all convinced by religious fundamentalism or post-Derridean deconstruction.
His discussion of each larger issue is really quite interesting, and he mobilizes primarily early modern European philosophers (almost universally before the Analytic/Continental divide), which is fair given that the target audience is anglophones who are dipping their feet into the field for the first time. Descartes and Hume …
This is a great introduction to philosophy as a practice. I was a bit concerned that it would be overly academic, but I was pleased that this wasn’t the case. When I read the table of contents, I thought that the text may be segmented by disciple: “philosophy of mind,” “logic,” “epistemology,” “ethics,” and so on.
Instead, Blackburn approaches larger themes and questions that philosophers ask. Then, he dives into perspectives that different thinkers take, while explaining their arguments to us. He seems charitable toward to most arguments, although Blackburn doesn’t seem at all convinced by religious fundamentalism or post-Derridean deconstruction.
His discussion of each larger issue is really quite interesting, and he mobilizes primarily early modern European philosophers (almost universally before the Analytic/Continental divide), which is fair given that the target audience is anglophones who are dipping their feet into the field for the first time. Descartes and Hume seem to get the most attention, with plenty here on Locke and Kant as well.
Blackburn’s tone is almost conversational, with a dry humor that feels warm. It eased the reading tremendously.
I can’t say say I “got” everything, but Think is an excellent starting point.