Post-scarcity anarchism

288 pages

English language

Published Nov. 8, 1971 by Ramparts Press.

ISBN:
978-0-87867-005-5
Copied ISBN!
OCLC Number:
159676

View on OpenLibrary

4 stars (7 reviews)

Post-Scarcity Anarchism is a collection of essays by Murray Bookchin, first published in 1971 by Ramparts Press. In it, Bookchin outlines the possible form anarchism might take under conditions of post-scarcity. One of Bookchin's major works, its author's radical thesis provoked controversy for being utopian in its faith in the liberatory potential of technology.

11 editions

reviewed Post-Scarcity Anarchism by Murray Bookchin

A very faint sketch

3 stars

This book is mostly concerned with the idea that technology CAN produce a post-scarcity society, but if you're expecting a clear picture of what that looks like or what it entails, you're going to be disappointed. I read the third edition which included "Listen, Marxist!" which includes a very valuable anarchist reading of the October Revolution and how power was consolidated.

When Bookchin is rattling off all of the things his enlightened anarchist society can cast off, a lot of it is feminine. It doesn't invalidate the book but it does highlight some of his limitations as a social thinker.

I grabbed this off The Anarchist Library and fixed all of the OCR errors that were made in its production as I read through so if you're looking for a nice digital edition, I can recommend it.

An amazing articulation of ideas

5 stars

This might be one of, if not the best books of it's kind I've ever read. Massive insight into social, ecological, technological, and philosophical concepts and and how they can play into liberatory fronts

It's not often you come across a book that fundamentally updates the way you think. This was the first of Bookchin's works that I have read, and will definitely be looking at more in the near future.

Review of 'Post-scarcity anarchism' on Goodreads

No rating

It's kinda funny the degree to which Bookchin praises the exact lifestylism which we now associate him with disavowing. I guess watching this counterculture get re-absorbed by bourgeois society must've been exactly what pushed him in that direction. Just a guess, I need to actually read later stuff.

There's a lot of brilliant attempts in here to sort traditional socialist dogma into two piles: the genuine theoretical core worth keeping and the reactions to specific historical moments which have nevertheless been uncritically accepted. This is a worthwhile read for any leftist, anyone invested in social revolution, or anyone interested in a somewhat more modern look at the revolutions and attempts at true democracy of the past.

Look, don't read this and take it to heart too much. Recognize that it came from a time where youth movements might have become something, when it seemed like a new revolutionary group entirely …

avatar for 0x520

rated it

4 stars
avatar for ian

rated it

5 stars