Poor Things

English language

Published 2023 by HarperCollins Publishers.

ISBN:
978-0-06-337468-3
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

(12 reviews)

A fantasy novel, presented as a discovered a manuscript, set in the nineteenth century. Frankenstein-like tale. Whitbread Novel Award, 1992.

16 editions

Review of 'Poor Things' on 'Goodreads'

Such a delightful, original, hilarious, clever and empathic book. Heavy sigh. Just loved it. I heard that the movie is only McCandless's POV and omits Bella's corrections. Not sure if that is true as I have not seen the movie, but the Bella perspective is absolutely essential, grounds the narrative and gives the book depth. The last section of extended fictional footnotes gets too fragmented and I was not so engaged, but even so it cannot take away the little masterpiece of a work that this is.

Review of 'Poor Things [Movie Tie-In]' on 'Goodreads'

Although I should have read the novel first, it was the 2023 film adaptation starring Emma Stone and Willem Dafoe that prompted me to pick up Poor Things by Scottish author Alasdair Gray (1934-2019). (According to the book stats, I was not the only one.) It exceeded my expectations, especially after reading it back-to-back with [b:Frankenstein|24131836|Frankenstein|Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1419726724l/24131836.SY75.jpg|4836639].

The comparison between the two books goes beyond the shared theme of resurrection. Both novels are structured as frame stories. Gray begins with a late-20th-century narrator explaining how a manuscript was discovered by one Archibald McCandless, accompanied by a more recent letter from Victoria McCandless, dismissing the story as nonsense. The two integral texts follow. Archibald’s story is so wildly fantastic that it’s a delight to read. It recounts how the scientist Godwin Baxter replaces the brain of a deceased young woman with that of her unborn child, after …

Review of 'Poor Things' on 'Storygraph'

I read this after watching the new movie, as I loved the movie and how weird it was. But damn was this so underwhelming! The plot (especially of the movie adaption) is really cool and weird, but the writing and usage of letters (which are hard to follow & enjoy) was so disappointing. I found the film genuinely quite funny, but this was not funny!! Not for me :(
I genuinely though it would work better as a book, but this ruined it for me

avatar for PanaX

rated it

avatar for skrud

rated it

avatar for boogah

rated it

avatar for teejay

rated it

avatar for urban_doormat

rated it

avatar for WorzelFG

rated it

avatar for Lieke

rated it

avatar for alonnn

rated it