The Man in the High Castle

274 pages

English language

Published Nov. 7, 2011 by Mariner Books.

ISBN:
978-0-547-57248-2
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

4 stars (21 reviews)

1 edition

An important book riddled with nuclear guilt

4 stars

It descends into psychosis, just as the other Philip K. Dick book I have read, which is alright, but not really my cup of tea.

The reason I give it four stars, not less, is that Westerners should really read it for a small glance of what it feels to live under occupation.

My biggest problem with the book is how glorified Japanese are in it. Of course, at no point we can see narrator's opinion on them, we only read the thoughts of people living under Japanese occupation, brainwashed and prone to rebellious outbursts, but I can't help but to observe the fact that the European holocaust is mentioned a lot, but the equivalent which has happened in Asia at the hands of Japanese is swept under the rug. It almost feels like the author doesn't want to touch this subject.

This quote about nazis, however, saves the book: …

Review of 'The Man in the High Castle' on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

The carefully constructed alternative history, in which the United States is partitioned among victorious Axis powers, only serves as a framework for exploring profound problems of existence. A masterpiece of subtle depth and brilliance, its brevity provides more foundation for thought than would be expected.

On a personal note, during the time I read it, my wife and I saw a play based on the multiverse concept, and I cannot be sure this was coincidence.

Review of 'The Man in the High Castle' on 'Goodreads'

2 stars

I was incredibly disappointed by this book.

After watching the first season of Amazon's TV adaptation, I was greatly looking forward to reading the book as I've always preferred originals to adaptations. Here though I found the opposite.

Whereas the characters on Amazon's adaptation are complex and three-dimensional, Dick's versions are flat, boring and largely racist/sexist. At first I wanted to write it off as critique, but the further I progressed through the novel the more I felt like I was watching Mickey Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffany's.

While the book raised many interesting questions about post-war America, ultimately it couldn't tie together any of the themes it raised into a coherent critique or even an otherwise satisfying plot.

Tl;dr: skip the book, watch the show.

Review of 'The man in the high castle' on Goodreads

3 stars

1) '''Gee,' the girl said, awed. 'Is that really true? That he had one of those on him that day?'
'Sure. And I know which it is. You see my point. It's all a big racket; they're playing it on themselves. I mean, a gun goes through a famous battle, like the Meuse-Argonne, and it's the same as if it hadn't, unless you know. It's in here.' He tapped his head. 'In the mind, not the gun.'''

2) ''No doubt about it, he thought as he hung up the phone. The Colt .44 affair had shaken him considerably. He no longer viewed his stock with the same reverence. Bit of knowledge like that goes a long way. Akin to primal childhood awakening; facts of life. Shows, he ruminated, the link with our early years: not merely U.S. history involved, but our own personal. As if, he thought, question might …

avatar for ryuslash

rated it

3 stars
avatar for TheKimmy

rated it

3 stars
avatar for hammondj

rated it

5 stars
avatar for brstf

rated it

4 stars
avatar for Reggie

rated it

4 stars
avatar for Beanalby

rated it

3 stars
avatar for oreoteeth

rated it

5 stars
avatar for Radwasp

rated it

4 stars
avatar for jameswynn

rated it

5 stars