The Next Great Migration

In the Acknowledgments at the end Shah briefly alludes to the “reconstruction of [her] ideas about migration and migrants” following a conversation with an MSF director... and that was when things clicked for me: this is a work from a recent convert. A damn fine work, to be sure, but that explains the tone, the structure, the missing counterarguments. The rosy tint. Knowing that bias beforehand would’ve helped me understand where she was coming from, so I pass it along not as a spoiler but as necessary preparation for the reader.

This is not a book about, as I had expected, the coming climate-related crises[1]; it is much more. Shah packs a lot of history and science into a readable 300 pages, and presents the current best scientific understanding of many migratory species. Including humans. And it’s all engaging, interesting, well researched, and uncomfortable. Yes, uncomfortable, even for a diehard open-borders nut like me: Shah argues in chapter 8 that we need to rethink our intolerance of invasive species, and that set me on edge: tamarisk? cane toad? asian carp? No mention. I have to conclude that this part was new-convert fanaticism, NRE if you will. But maybe not -- and I need to read more and think more. Shah has made me reexamine some assumptions, and that is the best compliment I can give a book.

[1] I use the term “crises” deliberately, despite her aversion for it (see her Afterword), to refer to the sociopolitical rejection of immigrants by small-minded psychopaths in positions of power. That is: migration is not the crisis; the infliction of suffering is.