It’s been hundreds of years since King Arthur’s reign. His descendant, Arthur, a future Lord and general gadabout, has been betrothed to Gwendoline, the quick-witted, short-tempered princess of England, since birth. The only thing they can agree on is that they despise each other.
They’re forced to spend the summer together at Camelot in the run-up to their nuptials, and within 24 hours, Gwen has discovered Arthur kissing a boy, and Arthur has gone digging for Gwen's childhood diary and found confessions about her crush on the kingdom's only lady knight, Bridget Leclair.
Realizing they might make better allies than enemies, Gwen and Art make a reluctant pact to cover for each other, and as things heat up at the annual royal tournament, Gwen is swept off her feet by her knight, and Arthur takes an interest in Gwen's royal brother. Lex Croucher's Gwen & Art Are Not in Love …
It’s been hundreds of years since King Arthur’s reign. His descendant, Arthur, a future Lord and general gadabout, has been betrothed to Gwendoline, the quick-witted, short-tempered princess of England, since birth. The only thing they can agree on is that they despise each other.
They’re forced to spend the summer together at Camelot in the run-up to their nuptials, and within 24 hours, Gwen has discovered Arthur kissing a boy, and Arthur has gone digging for Gwen's childhood diary and found confessions about her crush on the kingdom's only lady knight, Bridget Leclair.
Realizing they might make better allies than enemies, Gwen and Art make a reluctant pact to cover for each other, and as things heat up at the annual royal tournament, Gwen is swept off her feet by her knight, and Arthur takes an interest in Gwen's royal brother. Lex Croucher's Gwen & Art Are Not in Love is chock full of sword-fighting, found family, and romantic shenanigans destined to make readers fall in love.
Gay Arthurian fake dating with a dash of political intrigue for seasoning.
No rating
This was okay! I mean, I had fun. I think my biggest disappointment was that the romance felt oddly lacking? Gwen and Bridget seem only barely connected by mutual attraction, and Gabe treats Arthur like a bug most of the time. It’s all very cynical and a bit too tongue-in-cheek for my liking.
Some of the humor is fun, and other times it feels painfully forced. It’s very YA in how it reads, which is fine! Just not my preference.
Royal sons meant promise – they carried the hope and glory of their lineage, however reluctantly; royal daughters were born to be promised to somebody else.
A friend recommended this book to me as a "YA historical," but I think it's more of a... post-Arthurian fantasy with no magic. The vaguely medieval England is steeped in Arthurian legend, not actual history (and oh how I loved the characters poking fun at all the staples of the Arthurian myths!), and the characters behave in a rather modern way—and all of that is without a doubt part of the book's charm. I very much enjoyed this story with its quirkiness, queerness, and focus on found family. I also found myself way more immersed into this fictional England's politics than I expected to be. Mostly, though, I was invested in the characters.
In the early chapters, Art and Gwen made me think about …
Royal sons meant promise – they carried the hope and glory of their lineage, however reluctantly; royal daughters were born to be promised to somebody else.
A friend recommended this book to me as a "YA historical," but I think it's more of a... post-Arthurian fantasy with no magic. The vaguely medieval England is steeped in Arthurian legend, not actual history (and oh how I loved the characters poking fun at all the staples of the Arthurian myths!), and the characters behave in a rather modern way—and all of that is without a doubt part of the book's charm. I very much enjoyed this story with its quirkiness, queerness, and focus on found family. I also found myself way more immersed into this fictional England's politics than I expected to be. Mostly, though, I was invested in the characters.
In the early chapters, Art and Gwen made me think about one of my favorite childhood animated movies, Princess Swan. As I read about their recollections of their childhood shenanigans, I swear I had This Is My Idea playing in my head! :D Though unlike Dereck and Odette, when these two meet again when they're older, they don't immediately fall for each other. Instead, they catch each other being decidedly non-heterosexual with other people and strike a pact: "Let's fake being nice with each other so our parents leave us to our own devices."
Now, enemies to lovers, arranged marriage, and fake dating are all among my favorite romance tropes in the world. But apparently, I also love it when they're all mixed together and given a non-romantic spin! This was so refreshing and fun to read. I also loved how these two's arcs mirrored each other as they both struggled with the expectations their families and society placed on them. I think Gwen's way was more relatable to me, but Art's was more interesting to read about... though at some points of the book, it was kinda vise versa? Honestly, both of them are so relatable and interesting, and I can say the same for all the other characters. Sydney in particular absolutely stole my heart, and my one regret about the book is that Gabriel didn't get any POV chapters.
An awesome read, definitely one of my favorite books of the year. I'll be looking out for more novels from Lex Croucher now!
Review of 'Gwen and Art Are Not in Love' on 'Goodreads'
No rating
I really wanted to like this one. The premise sounded fun and the writing style was inviting, but I just couldn't bring myself to care for any of the characters. Gwen and Arthur are so whiny and one-dimensional that I didn't care about their fates or budding relationships. I was also hoping for more Arthurian legend content, but it was more name dropping than anything else. Overall, I'm disappointed.
Thank you to NetGalley and Wednesday Books for the ARC.
