I Want a Better Catastrophe

Navigating the Climate Crisis with Grief, Hope, and Gallows Humor

Paperback, 416 pages

English language

Published Feb. 14, 2023 by New Society Publishers, Limited.

ISBN:
978-0-86571-983-5
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

(2 reviews)

An existential manual for tragic optimists, can-do pessimists, and compassionate doomers

With global heating projected to rocket past the 1.5°C limit, lifelong activist Andrew Boyd is thrown into a crisis of hope, and off on a quest to learn how to live with the impossible news of our climate doom.

He searches out eight of today's leading climate thinkers--from activist Tim DeChristopher to collapse-psychologist Jamey Hecht, grassroots strategist Adrienne Maree Brown, eco-philosopher Joana Macy, and Indigenous botanist Robin Wall Kimmerer--asking them: Is it really the end of the world, and if so, now what?

With gallows humor and a broken heart, Boyd steers readers through their climate angst as he walks his own. Boyd's journey takes him from storm-battered coastlines to pipeline blockades and hopelessness workshops. Along the way, he maps out our existential options and tackles some familiar dilemmas: Should I bring kids into such a world? Can I …

3 editions

Review of 'I Want a Better Catastrophe'

I really appreciated the pessimistic premise and I recognise many of the thoughts and predicaments that Boyd is struggling with. Ultimately, I don't even mind the lack of answers. There's only a direction. It's not a bad book for people who are struggling with the climate crisis. But I, personally, missed some focus and maybe more forceful, combative attitudes.

Conflicted, but absolutely recommend

This book seriously started out as a 1 star for me that almost found itself in the did not finish pile. I find many of my perspectives amd unserstanding of the climate science to align with the author, so why was this almost a flop for me and what changed it?

Well to start with what didn't work, it really comes down to my expectations. I was expecting a journalistic approach of here's how we're all fucked and the inventive ways some revolutionary thinkers have devised to make a different inspire of everything. What ended up being presented was a multi-year process of churning breakdowns and rediscoveries that color the overarching narrative with a grasping for logic where there is none and a generous helping of turning away from reason because it doesn't match their personal worldview. So many contradictions abound, I felt very unsympathetic. I'm not a lifelong activist; …