Review of 'Political Order and Political Decay' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
It was a pleasure to join the clear mind of Francis Fukuyama in this second volume of his work on political order. Whilehis first volume ([b:The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution|9704856|The Origins of Political Order From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution|Francis Fukuyama|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1317064084s/9704856.jpg|14593088]) argued in favor of a triad of rule of law, effective statehood and accountability, he used this second volume to show how different balances between these three elements have led to wildly varying political outcomes in the modern age.
Given the exhaustive nature of the political order project, I am pretty sure both books offer something for everyone. Personally, I found it quite interesting to read a strong defense of bureaucracy or, to be more precise, autonomous bureaucracy. Fukuyama's arguments in favor of a strong state should be taken to heart by minarchists and anarchists alike, especially since he argues that …
It was a pleasure to join the clear mind of Francis Fukuyama in this second volume of his work on political order. Whilehis first volume ([b:The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution|9704856|The Origins of Political Order From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution|Francis Fukuyama|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1317064084s/9704856.jpg|14593088]) argued in favor of a triad of rule of law, effective statehood and accountability, he used this second volume to show how different balances between these three elements have led to wildly varying political outcomes in the modern age.
Given the exhaustive nature of the political order project, I am pretty sure both books offer something for everyone. Personally, I found it quite interesting to read a strong defense of bureaucracy or, to be more precise, autonomous bureaucracy. Fukuyama's arguments in favor of a strong state should be taken to heart by minarchists and anarchists alike, especially since he argues that some of the popular alternatives to state power (e.g. decentralized judicial systems) lead to capture of the political process by interest groups or to other forms of political decay. It will be interesting to read [b:The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy|22245334|The Utopia of Rules On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy|David Graeber|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1417415465s/22245334.jpg|41620170] with Fukuyama's arguments in mind.
One problem of Political Order and Political Decay is that is it poorly edited. A work of this scope can only be written with a good team overseeing structure, and that clearly didn't happen. Key insights were repeated over and over again, while some discussions were so short they could just as well have been skipped (the section on the Arab Spring was particularly superficial and disappointing). However, these shortcomings shouldn't deter anyone: both this book and The Origins of Political Order are fascinating reads for the politically and historically inclined.