As the sociologist David Morgan writes "The idea of the provider is a major element in the construction of a masculine identity. It is a moral as well as an economic category. For at least the last few thousand years. Men could essentially describe their role in four words 'providing for my family.'"
My poll has concluded, and it has confirmed my suspicions - a lot of men (myself included) have not really been socialized to talk openly about their emotions.
This might be a generational thing - I grew up in 1980s Germany, and I think younger generations are getting better at this. It might also be a matter of education - while I have PhD, I am from a working class family.
But it definitely was, and is, a problem. The default assumption always was that men had to stand on their own, that men had to cope with anything life threw at them, that any man who could _not_ cope with things was weak and deserving of contempt - and the only "negative emotion" that was acceptable to show was anger and rage.
Which is messed up - if we are not free to talk about our emotions, then how …
My poll has concluded, and it has confirmed my suspicions - a lot of men (myself included) have not really been socialized to talk openly about their emotions.
This might be a generational thing - I grew up in 1980s Germany, and I think younger generations are getting better at this. It might also be a matter of education - while I have PhD, I am from a working class family.
But it definitely was, and is, a problem. The default assumption always was that men had to stand on their own, that men had to cope with anything life threw at them, that any man who could _not_ cope with things was weak and deserving of contempt - and the only "negative emotion" that was acceptable to show was anger and rage.
Which is messed up - if we are not free to talk about our emotions, then how are we supposed to work through them other than trial and error? I do know that it took me many years to work though my own issues.
I think this is a great contributor to #ToxicMasculinity . Don't get me wrong, none of this excuses the men who embrace it for their actions. They have full agency, and own their toxic behavior. But when you are taught that anger is the only negative emotion that you can publicly express, then embracing it can become very tempting.
"Sonder explores masculinity through the lens of domesticity, examining not only how men interact with one another but also their relationships with the spaces and objects around them."
“There is a movement afoot in America that says in order to protect and ‘save’ young boys and men, they must become disciples of the movement of White Jesus. Unlike Jesus Christ, White Jesus is on a violent quest for naked power and influence and wealth.”
~ Angela Denker, Disciples of White Jesus: The Radicalization of American Boyhood (Minneapolis: Broadleaf, 2025), p. xii
“'Told again and again [by traditionalist evangelical leaders] that they are the dominant sex, created to rule over and have dominion over not just women but the earth, the land, its animals, and all things on earth — it’s often a rude awakening for young, White Christian men when they enter the world and find that most created things are not interested in being ruled over by them,' [Angela] Denker writes."
It's not #feminism that has made men feel insecure, or uncertain how to be a man. It's #patriarchy, which demands that men become the violent daddy-oppressors of themselves. It's not feminism which makes men feel weak and irrelevant. Again, that's patriarchy, which splits men into successful patriarchs and whiney failures—partially as an external matter of haves and have-nots, but also as an internal fracture, which demands men judge themselves by the unremitting standards of perfect mastery and empowerment."
The masculine stereotype — tough, confident, aggressive, anti-intellectual, emotionally remote — has sustained through human history by being passed down from generation to generation. https://buff.ly/PrLtttT
"A Public Religion Research Institute study from the Fall revealed the strong connection between the role of patriarchy, attitudes on child-rearing, and religiosity that directly predict one’s support for both Trump and violent authoritarianism. We are all now hijacked by powerful men like Donald Trump, whose parental figures were mostly vindictive, cruel, or absent."
Peggy Orenstein reveals what she learn interviewing high school and college young men on their …
A look inside the mind of young men on these tricky subjects.
4 stars
This book has frank discussions of sex and masculinity. It fully acknowledges that teenagers have sex, but does not glorify nor damn it.
This was a really interesting book. As a guy, who was/is struggling with this subject. And as a guy who avoided all of this in his teens and 20s. Mostly because I was scared about how any of it could go bad. But reading this, I find out even the guys doing them regularly are not sure what they're doing. And are worried about it still. Some interesting insights with good journalistic work.
#Books#Bookstodon#Gender#Masculinity
Bloomberg offers a valuable, well-documented discussion of the key role that a number of YouTube "influencers" played in pushing young males towards Donald Trump in the last election:
Men, and particularly white men, have long made up Trump’s core support base. But in November’s election, young men swung especially hard to the right.