Allen Shull rated Dusk of Dawn: 5 stars

Dusk of Dawn by W. E. B. Du Bois
Dusk of Dawn: An Essay Toward an Autobiography of a Race Concept is a 1940 autobiographical text by W. E. …
I teach college English. I’m working on my PhD in English. I speak English. But at the same time, I’m American. I’m just this guy, you know?
This link opens in a pop-up window
Dusk of Dawn: An Essay Toward an Autobiography of a Race Concept is a 1940 autobiographical text by W. E. …
The Souls of Black Folk: Essays and Sketches is a 1903 work of American literature by W. E. B. Du …
Having now read this, I can see why it’s not listed as one of Wyndham’s classics, especially mere days after reading The Midwich Cuckoos.
However, there’s good stuff here. It’s a generational, in the same way that Cixin Liu would much later do much better. From 1959, it’s limited by an understanding of certain technical aspects, but those don’t really matter, because Wyndham doesn’t really care about the different kinds of Venusian life.
Most of the focus is on the relentless drive the characters have—the eponymous “outward urge.” That’s what makes it both grounded “hard” SF and also space opera: these are what test pilots are like, but also the numinous sense of the grander scale of the universe is indeed operatic.
If I were Wyndham’s editor, though, I’d say, “John, great stuff here, but it needs to be more than a fix-up book. And I don’t mean ‘just …
Having now read this, I can see why it’s not listed as one of Wyndham’s classics, especially mere days after reading The Midwich Cuckoos.
However, there’s good stuff here. It’s a generational, in the same way that Cixin Liu would much later do much better. From 1959, it’s limited by an understanding of certain technical aspects, but those don’t really matter, because Wyndham doesn’t really care about the different kinds of Venusian life.
Most of the focus is on the relentless drive the characters have—the eponymous “outward urge.” That’s what makes it both grounded “hard” SF and also space opera: these are what test pilots are like, but also the numinous sense of the grander scale of the universe is indeed operatic.
If I were Wyndham’s editor, though, I’d say, “John, great stuff here, but it needs to be more than a fix-up book. And I don’t mean ‘just put frames around things’ like Asimov does. You need to weave these stories together more. That gives not only a greater scope and mission, but also a greater unity—a purpose.”
…yet haunted by the future. Buber’s perception of the anarchist and coöperative movements through the advent of Marx and Lenin, are invaluable. However, having just read his epilogue which trumpets the success of kibbutzim, I am sad to see what Buber couldn’t: the dismantling of these collective agrarian movements by urban, individualistic, liberal capitalism of the 1970s.
Still, in a world divided between secular collectivism and religious individualism, Buber offers a clear alternative to both. Even for those who aren’t religious, Buber’s religiosity is conceptual and motivational rather than repressive. We need, though, a Buber for Buber.
In this work, Buber expounds upon and defends the Zionist experiment - a federal system of communities on a co-operative …
There’s definitely something here about nature vs nurture, about determinism vs free will, about open vs closed societies, about science vs tradition. It holds up—save for a few moments about other societies—remarkably well.
Content warning CW: Spoilers, Violence
Undeniable to see why this book is a classic. At the same time, it is problematic as all get out. The main character is terrible; at least, Bester seems to be saying, he knows he’s horrible. You’ll see people comparing this to The Count of Monte Cristo—but does that main character commit rape in the first 30 pages, and then halfway through kidnap his victim in order to force her to obey him? Everyone in this story is utterly out for revenge.
And yet, the imagery and the invention is so particular. The grandeur of scenes is arresting. There is pure spectacle—not mere garishness but also interesting and strange and fascinating images. There’s so much going on in the occasional details. A man builds train tracks to make a grand entrance. A street hustler sells photos of Christians offering illegal prayers. A space colony of stoics is kept in shelves like sardines. A woman who is blind to the visual spectrum but sees above and below it delights in the flashes of an orbital bombardment. And of course I’m not even mentioning the ending. I’ll say this: I don’t know how this book works as an ebook, strictly because of the typesetting.
Is it worth it? Dostoevsky can show terrible people doing terrible things with a good message to the reader; just because the main character is a monster does not mean the main character is a hero. We do not want to identify with Gully Foyle, and we readers can tell that everyone who judges him is right. But still, I just don’t know.
Unlike most utopias, Walden Two is set in the present, in an intentional community. It also is openly aware of utopias from Plato and More through Bellamy, Butler, and Morris. Skinner proposes actual experimentation, but allowing for freedom of movement in and out of the community. However, he proposes this society also expand to include all humanity, which hurts that last proposition. Also, Skinner assumes there can be government without power games.
The only negative of this volume that I can count against it is the fact that it leans on plot synopses too much. It DOES bill itself as a Critical Introduction, but I wish it were more critical and less introduction. A good amount of space is devoted to secondary scholarship, but there’s also more than a little that’s left out; it feels like more space is devoted to non-scholarly book reviews; but then why would they be so highlighted in a critical introduction? Still, good exploration of the series as a whole.
This critical history of Iain M. Banks' Culture novels covers the series from its inception in the 1970s to the …
The Green Isle of the Great Deep is a 1944 dystopian novel by Neil M. Gunn. Whilst the book features …
Good modern allegory, definitely in the lineage of Lindsay's Voyage to Arcturus, MacDonald's Phantastes, as well as images of the Scottish country life that would be at home in John Galt or Lewis Grassic Gibbon. It also looks forward to C.S. Lewis's Space Trilogy, especially That Hideous Strength, and even to works like Ishiguro's The Buried Giant and the TV show Severance.
Seriously, Macpherson/Ossian’s Fingal is terrible. It’s finally giving me ideas about the psyche of 18th century Scotland, but it is not good. At any given point if I fall asleep in the middle and try to pick it back up, I would not be able to find where I left off. If a computer would randomly shuffle names and give me an infinitely scrolling page I would not notice.
So what am I getting from it? Well, there’s the beginning stages of medievalism—recovering a fake past—as well as the beginnings of folklore collection. There’s a wistful longing for days gone by, as blind Ossian is telling the story of his father, a far greater man. In 1760s Scotland, yearning for a past warrior-king from the PoV of a son now blind and aged except for his voice—it is something. But it’s simultaneously lapsarian and millenarian. The golden age is past, …
Seriously, Macpherson/Ossian’s Fingal is terrible. It’s finally giving me ideas about the psyche of 18th century Scotland, but it is not good. At any given point if I fall asleep in the middle and try to pick it back up, I would not be able to find where I left off. If a computer would randomly shuffle names and give me an infinitely scrolling page I would not notice.
So what am I getting from it? Well, there’s the beginning stages of medievalism—recovering a fake past—as well as the beginnings of folklore collection. There’s a wistful longing for days gone by, as blind Ossian is telling the story of his father, a far greater man. In 1760s Scotland, yearning for a past warrior-king from the PoV of a son now blind and aged except for his voice—it is something. But it’s simultaneously lapsarian and millenarian. The golden age is past, never to return.
But also the characterization is bad. In Book V Orla dies—seconds after being introduced. And it’s so terrible it’s all anyone can talk about. That’s not how stories work! ALL stories set up characters if we’re supposed to feel something about them! I just wish people would stop rolling their red eyes.
I mean people. I’ve read the “Eye of Argon.” This is worse than that.
In Fingal: - People declare more than do. They full-on speechify. Things are done, and will be done, but things never happen in the moment: speeches about what’s going to happen chased by speeches about what just happened. The deed is an infinitesimal point. - Every woman is “white bosomed.” Every one. Almost no other anatomical feature is mentioned. Long hair, I guess.
To quote Beverly Cleary’s Ramona Quimby, Age 8 (an enduringly lovely series): “I can’t believe I read the whole thing.”
Good early feminist utopia. I want to say “proto-feminist” but I’m going to say “0th wave” as it’s thirty years before Seneca Falls, and it’s definitely advocating for societal change motivated by women—no "proto" about it. But also STRONGLY ecological. Like I-want-to-write-a-paper strong.