okay book. i think i'm a little tired of the world. i think the trilogy began really strong and book 2 and 3 haven't really been the same.
User Profile
| lgbtq | marxist | linux | furry | sometimes nsfw |
learning haskell & deleuze
DMs are open. I like talking to new people.
This link opens in a pop-up window
aThousandCateaus (bookwyrm)'s books
2025 Reading Goal
62% complete! aThousandCateaus (bookwyrm) has read 5 of 8 books.
User Activity
RSS feed Back
aThousandCateaus (bookwyrm) set a goal to read 8 books in 2025
aThousandCateaus (bookwyrm) finished reading Imago by Octavia E. Butler
aThousandCateaus (bookwyrm) started reading Imago by Octavia E. Butler
aThousandCateaus (bookwyrm) finished reading Adulthood Rites by Octavia E. Butler (Xenogenesis, #2)
aThousandCateaus (bookwyrm) started reading Adulthood Rites by Octavia E. Butler (Xenogenesis, #2)
aThousandCateaus (bookwyrm) finished reading Dawn by Octavia E. Butler (Xenogenesis trilogy -- bk. 1)
P21: All the things which follow from the absolute nature of any of God’s attributes have always had to exist and be infinite, or, are, through the same attribute, eternal and infinite.
P22: Whatever follows from some attribute of God insofar as it is modified by a modification which, through the same attribute, exists necessarily and is infinite, must also exist and be infinite.
P23: Every mode which exists necessarily and is infinite has necessarily had to follow either from the absolute nature of some attribute of God, or from some attribute, modified by a modification which exists necessarily and is infinite.
— Ethics (Penguin Classics) by Baruch Spinoza, Baruch Spinoza
Things this makes me think of:
-- When Mufasa says "everything the light touches is our kingdom." -- The GPL license and the way modifications are required to be licensed compatibly. -- Zombies and The Spread.
All godly things.
aThousandCateaus (bookwyrm) commented on Ethics (Penguin Classics) by Baruch Spinoza
The Ethics seems pretty cumbersome to read. It lays out everything as definitions, axioms, propositions and later ones often reference former ones and expect/require you to go back and reference previous statements.
I think my approach to the book as a first read is probably gonna be, for the most part, to read it without incessant look backs and just see where the argument goes.