User Profile

××××× (bookwyrm)

athousandcateaus@bookwyrm.social

Joined 2 years, 6 months ago

uwu

This link opens in a pop-up window

××××× (bookwyrm)'s books

Currently Reading (View all 47)

2025 Reading Goal

64% complete! ××××× (bookwyrm) has read 41 of 64 books.

Edmund White: The Loves of My Life No rating

Maybe I’ve forgotten him because I wrote about him; I’ve always thought that writing about someone is the kiss-off. Nabokov, in Speak, Memory, was apprehensive about writing about his nanny since he liked revisiting her in his thoughts and he knew once he’d committed her to print, he’d lose her. Some people wonder why I’ve not written about them. If they’re a current part of my life, I need to keep them on life support; my husband is Michael Carroll, whom I’ve been with since 1995. I’ve never written about him; he’s too precious to me. My recent fiction is less autobiography and more thought experiment. I assemble my monsters from stolen body parts (his nape, her stutter). Often I want to lead the reader to a better (more compassionate, more forgiving, bolder, more loving) world by picturing it as if it already existed; George Meredith called that process “moral sculpture.”

The Loves of My Life by 

Jenny Hval: Paradise rot (2018)

Jo is in a strange new country for university, and having a more peculiar time …

Content warning nsfw

Jenny Hval: Paradise rot (2018)

Jo is in a strange new country for university, and having a more peculiar time …

started the audiobook a little while ago, it's very strange but i enjoyed it. it's a pretty gross book about decay, a poorly upkept house (full of fungi, insects, etc.) and people melting into one another. Also, there is a lot of urine in this book for some reason. it's also lesbian as hell. i am glad i listened to it, i should listen to some of jenny hval's music :3

Brent Adkins: Deleuze and Guattari's a Thousand Plateaus (2015, Edinburgh University Press)

“Thus it is not surprising that the distinction we were seeking was not between assemblages and something else but between two limits of any possible assemblage, in other words between the system of strata and the plane of consistency. We should not forget that the strata rigidify and are organized on the plane of consistency, and that the plane of consistency is at work and is constructed in the strata, in both cases piece by piece, blow by blow, operation by operation. (TP 337, emphasis added)”

This is perhaps the most succinct statement in A Thousand Plateaus of the basic thesis of this guide. Deleuze and Guattari do not see their task as one of sorting assemblages into “good” rhizomatic assemblages and “bad” arborescent assemblages. Rhizome and tree, consistency and organization, change and stasis—all of these oppositions are the two opposed limits of any assemblage. Perceptual semiotics consists in seeing the ways in which different assemblages construct and map out this opposition.

Deleuze and Guattari's a Thousand Plateaus by 

yup

Brent Adkins: Deleuze and Guattari's a Thousand Plateaus (2015, Edinburgh University Press)

From Deleuze and Guattari’s perspective, asking what is “innate” already presupposes too much. In particular, it presupposes an answer to the question of consistency, an arborescent answer. The innate/acquired dichotomy presupposes a rigid boundary between an organism and its environment, rather than supposing that an organism is a “selection of the exterior” and that the environment is a “projection of the interior.”

Deleuze and Guattari's a Thousand Plateaus by 

i like that conception.