User Profile

Aaron

awmarrs@bookwyrm.social

Joined 1 year, 4 months ago

Historian of antebellum technology and contemporary diplomacy.

Mastodon: historians.social/@awmarrs

This link opens in a pop-up window

Aaron's books

Currently Reading

2024 Reading Goal

67% complete! Aaron has read 27 of 40 books.

Hilke Schellmann: Algorithm (2024, Hachette Books) 3 stars

The Algorithm

3 stars

In this book, Schellmann takes a deep dive into the artificial intelligence tools that employers use to vet, monitor, and fire their employees. She surveys the landscape, and, frankly, it is terrifying and depressing. What seems particularly mind-numbing is that these AI tools don't seem to be very effective, but employers desperate to cut costs (regardless of the cost to the humanity of their employees) keep adopting them anyway. The allure of a "scientific" solution is so powerful that employers ignore or don't care about the downsides. Schellmann draws a comparison to phrenology at one point that is both apt and bleak. Unfortunately, the book could have used another round of editing, and gets repetitive in places (including almost the exact same quotation appearing on pages 56 and 73). But if you are on the job market or know someone who is, you might as well pick this up and …

Hilke Schellmann: Algorithm (2024, Hachette Books) 3 stars

David Futrell was the director of selection and assessment at Walmart, which is the largest private employer in the United States. He and his team ran one of the largest hiring machines on the planet and assessed thousands of Walmart applicants every day. He shared his experience wit AI and machine learning tools on a panel at an industry conference in 2020: "I was very excited by these tools whenever I first started seeing them. So I've been doing a kind of traditional prediction using regression and correlation techniques for many years and a lot of these machine learning tools are just super fast and sophisticated ways to test all of the possible combinations." Because Futrell's team assessed thousands of people a day, he had an abundance of data at his fingertips and didn't run into such problems as small sample size, which could skew results. He asked his team to test a lot of the new AI tools. And he was disappointed: "When we tested this and in practice, we didn't find that machine learning predictions to be substantially better than the old-fashioned way." So, neither in computer labs nor in applied settings did AI outperform traditional statistical models. And neither method achieved much statistical relevance.

Algorithm by  (Page 279 - 280)

Sean M. Kelley: American Slavers (2023, Yale University Press) 5 stars

American Slavers

5 stars

A stunning achievement. Kelley has written a detailed and persuasive assessment of the role that the United States played in the international slave trade. He argues' that the importance of the United States in this trade shifted over time; even after the supposed end of the United States' involvement in the trade after 1808, U.S. businessmen continued to profit from trade in human beings through their connections, by supplying or building ships which were part of the trade, and so on. Lucidly written and compellingly argued.

Meredith Broussard: More Than a Glitch (2023, MIT Press) 5 stars

When technology reinforces inequality, it's not just a glitch—it's a signal that we need to …

More than a Glitch

5 stars

This book is a comprehensive overview of issues of bias in technology. Broussard tackles a range of topics and does so systematically. Her examples are timely and well-chosen, and leave little doubt as to the deep problems that we face with technology, and the utter indifference of most people working in this space. If we are to truly effect change, we first have to recognize the problems and think about how to solve them; this book is an important first step in that process.

Meredith Broussard: More Than a Glitch (2023, MIT Press) 5 stars

When technology reinforces inequality, it's not just a glitch—it's a signal that we need to …

Tech is racist and sexist and ableist because the world is so. Computers just reflect the existing reality and suggest that things will stay the same—they predict the status quo. By adopting a more critical view of technology, and by being choosier about the tech we allow into our lives and our society, we can employ technology to stop reproducing the world as it is, and get us closer to a world that is truly more just.

More Than a Glitch by  (Page 188)

Meredith Broussard: More Than a Glitch (2023, MIT Press) 5 stars

When technology reinforces inequality, it's not just a glitch—it's a signal that we need to …

The bureaucrats who decided to use a computer to assign grades are guilty of technochauvinism. They thought that the algorithm would offer objective, fair grades and that the computational solution would be sufficient in a time of global crisis. It wasn't, because a grade in education is a social decision, not merely a mathematical one. Computers are rarely the fairest solution when it comes to social decisions.

More Than a Glitch by  (Page 69)