Back
Alicia Juarrero: Context Changes Everything (2023, MIT Press, The MIT Press)

#JuarreroBook Chapter 6 Part 2

so, moving on... The examples were meant to illustrate the notion of context dependent constraint, specifically context dependent enabling constraints:

"Enabling constraints (Pattee 1973; Salthe 1985; Juarrero 1999) are context-dependent constraints that irreversibly link and couple previously separate and entities at the same scale as the constraints."

e.g., "The rolling columns of fluid that constitute a Bénard cell are nothing other than interdependent, coherent dynamics generated by enabling constraints"

such " coordinated and coherent dynamics have emergent proper-ties their components severally do not, not least of which is their capacity to affect the properties and behaviors of those components that make them up. Phase locking, resonance, synchronization, and entrainment are emergent properties of coherently organized interdependent dynamics.Enabling context-dependent constraints are therefore constraints that make the probability of one event conditional upon another. "

"They irreversibly generate emergent and coherent, metastable patterns of matter and energy …

@uh Thanks for this summary, @UlrikeHahn!

I confess I didn't get anything from this 2nd part (I stopped on p.79): it struck me as a mix of platitudes that are no challenge to current scientific approaches, and baffling passages that I failed to understand. There is also a problematic conflation of artefacts, intentionally built in certain ways because we planned them that way, and 'natural' constraints. (And characteristically, no argument for why those should be treated in the same way).

@uh @UlrikeHahn I have to say that my motivation (and patience) for this book are starting to falter. I'm not getting much from reading it other than the interesting discussions with you and others trying to make sense of the book. But this is more your merit than J.'s, I'm afraid.

For example, did you get why the nardoo preparation becomes a context-independent constraint (in opposition to what, btw)? In general, J. seems to be just relabelling things in vague, unhelpful and unargued for ways

@dcm @uh I wondered whether that was a typo… just like I wondered about this passage:

„It is a central claim of this book that such coherent structures and dynam-
ics constitute real and novel, interactional types of entities. Interactional
types should not be reified“

the way I would naturally read those two sentences, they seem contradictory…?

-there‘s been a couple places where I have suspected copy editing issues as a possible source of confusion

@UlrikeHahn @uh They seem contradictory to me too. Given how often this has happened earlier in the book as well, I don't think it is a matter of copy-editing, but rather of lack of rigour and clarity.
More subjectively, the book reads to me more as an attempt at poetry or literature than at philosophy or science. There are basically no arguments, evidence is not presented in detail, terms are not properly defined. But there's quite some rhetoric, smart turns of phrase, imagery, analogies, etc.