DirkReading started reading Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely

Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely
How do we think about money?What caused bankers to lose sight of the economy?What caused individuals to take on mortgages …
German Torontonian. Universally curious. Fedizen since 2018.
This link opens in a pop-up window
Success! DirkReading has read 56 of 50 books.

How do we think about money?What caused bankers to lose sight of the economy?What caused individuals to take on mortgages …
I wanted to read this book to see why it is regarded as such a classic. Now I know. Nabokov is truly a master of language, this book‘s prose is truly amazing. However, I could not stand being in the main character‘s head, and so I stopped reading after 50 pages.
Anil Seth takes us on a journey through the philosophy and science of consciousness. At some point I stopped counting how many new ideas and fresh perspectives he introduced. This book chamged how I think about the world and that says something…

An intimate, revealing memoir from one of the most important activists of our time.
While working as an intelligence …

An intimate, revealing memoir from one of the most important activists of our time.
While working as an intelligence …
I hold a MSc in Artificial Intelligence and work with software developers in a company that arguably leads the movement towards AGI. I‘m surrounded by techno optimists with awe and deep appreciation for the possibilities but at the same time most people I know in the industry and beyond are worried. That includes me. When I got this book I almost expected the title to be hyperbole to catch attention but you would be mistaken to assume that. Instead Eliezer and Nate lay out in easy to follow language their arguments why the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence will very likely equate a massive and deadly disaster. Now, if you feel intuitively like dismissing this thought as „doomerism“ - please make a point of reading and then showing where the arguments don‘t hold. I follow the space for years now and Ireally would like to read a convincing case why …
I hold a MSc in Artificial Intelligence and work with software developers in a company that arguably leads the movement towards AGI. I‘m surrounded by techno optimists with awe and deep appreciation for the possibilities but at the same time most people I know in the industry and beyond are worried. That includes me. When I got this book I almost expected the title to be hyperbole to catch attention but you would be mistaken to assume that. Instead Eliezer and Nate lay out in easy to follow language their arguments why the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence will very likely equate a massive and deadly disaster. Now, if you feel intuitively like dismissing this thought as „doomerism“ - please make a point of reading and then showing where the arguments don‘t hold. I follow the space for years now and Ireally would like to read a convincing case why they are wrong.

AI is the greatest threat to our existence that we have ever faced.
The scramble to create superhuman AI …

AI is the greatest threat to our existence that we have ever faced.
The scramble to create superhuman AI …