User Profile

Claudius Link

realn2s@bookwyrm.social

Joined 2 years, 6 months ago

According to my daughter I'm "in love with books".

I read a lot of Nonfiction books related to Cyber Security, Organizational Development, and Software Development in general. I'm interested in the human side of technology.

You can find me on infosec.exchange/@realn2s / @realn2s@infosec.exchange

This link opens in a pop-up window

Claudius Link's books

Currently Reading (View all 13)

Anne Applebaum: Autocracy Inc. (Paperback, 2024, 23 juli 2024)

We think we know what an autocratic state looks like: There is an all-powerful leader …

Important topic and well written but missing aspects

I found it an interesting read but a bit one-sided leaving out the involvement of the "western democraties". Which for decades had (and have) no problem other toppling democratic governments, selling weapons to autocrats and stifling change and democratic progress by insisting the depth made by autocrats (for eg. weapons) have to be paid back even after a regime change. As well as e.g mentioning the torture of US soldiers during and following the war in Vietnam but leaving out torture committed et the time by US forces.

This leave me with questions and the feeling that the story is too straight

Sarah Wynn-Williams: Careless People (Paperback, Pan Macmillan)

Sarah Wynn-Williams, a young diplomat from New Zealand, pitched for her dream job. She saw …

Therapeutic trauma writeup

The book feels a bit like a therapeutic writeup to process trauma. While it is a smooth read, I missed real content. It basically shows what incredible clueless a*hole the leadership team of Meta are.

Other reviews correctly point out the complicitness like the ones from * @pivic@bookwyrm.social bookwyrm.social/user/pivic/review/6984051/s/a-self-protecting-ride-through-autocracy-kleptocracy-and-capitalism * @benwerd@bookwyrm.social bookwyrm.social/user/benwerd/review/7024817/s/these-are-the-people-to-avoid

or also

Nick Bostrom: Superintelligence (2016, Oxford University Press)

The human brain has some capabilities that the brains of other animals lack. It is …

A colleague recommended the book to me. I have to say, I hate it. By now it is a pure rage read.

I find it a lazy researched (if at all), sloppily write and a boring and wordy read without a significant amount of relevant information.

Additionally, I find the moral and ethical standing of the author questionable.

Matt Ruff: Set this house in order (Paperback, 2004, Perennial)

Andy Gage was born in 1965 and murdered not long after by his stepfather... It …

Or had been quite some time since i tag the book. Reading it i realised that i has no idea of the protagonist was a man or a women. Actually the classification doesn't make any sense. Which made me realise that the classification isn't important in other settings either and fit sure isn't biological

Richard Rumelt: Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters (2013)

Recently I took the book because it was referenced in Kill it with Fire bookwyrm.social/book/106715/s/kill-it-with-fire

The first surprise, I had read it already but can't remember anything from it :-(

I now have read it again halfway through and have mixed feelings. While it addresses a real problem and has some good ideas or put them into clear words, it is one of this classical "self-help" book. IMHO it lacks the data to support the methods it proposes.

One reoccurring element is that bad strategies are analyzed, and their bad outcome is explained. But "good strategies" are just described, and their outcome is not mentioned. An the "good strategies" include Richard Kovacevich cross-selling strategy of Wells Fargo which lead to the Wells Fargo cross-selling scandal (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wells_Fargo_cross-selling_scandal). The first edition of the book was published before the scandal, nevertheless it shows that good/bad strategy bears no relation to the …

John Viega: The myths of security (Paperback, 2009, O'Reilly)

If you think computer security has improved in recent years, The Myths of Security will …

Aged security read, lacking a common thread, finishing weak

As the book is from 2009 it deserves some slack for some of the content. For the age it contains a surprising (or disappointing) amount of still current statement and correct predictions.

But unsurprisingly nothing new.

Sadly the book is lacking a common thread. I feels like the author just duped his thoughts on a variety of topics. While many chapters provide an insightful view or at least an interesting perspective, the last few chapters, often only one page each, are just unreflected and carelessly stated opinions.

E.g. the chapters on privacy and anonymity are each less than a page, both more or less state "customers don't car, why bother. If you have nothing to hid you don't need to care"

Which is especially irritation as the closest thing to a common threat in the book was "users don't care about security. We need to make/help them care more"

The …