nopewhat reviewed 'Richard III', William Shakespeare by William Shakespeare (Plays in performance)
None
Qlippoth: The Inverse Tree | Element: Fire | Demonic catalogs, nihilism, the shadow tradition

William Shakespeare: Richard III (2017, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform)
114 pages
English language
Published 2017 by CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
"containing his treacherous plots against his brother Clarence, the pittiefull murther of his innocent nephewes, his tyrannicall usurpation, with the whole course of his detested life and most deserved death" (Subtitle of the 1597 edition.)
"containing his treacherous plots against his brother Clarence, the pittiefull murther of his innocent nephewes, his tyrannicall usurpation, with the whole course of his detested life and most deserved death" (Subtitle of the 1597 edition.)
Qlippoth: The Inverse Tree | Element: Fire | Demonic catalogs, nihilism, the shadow tradition
“Have I told you I love you recently?”
“No, you’ve been cruelly reticent and I’ve had no choice but to be sentimental enough for the two of us.” Cooper shook his fist at the ceiling. “Curse this new burden of being the most emotionally healthy person in the house. I hate it!”
I pretty much love this as a series conclusion. At the same time, I have a bit of mixed feelings about certain aspects, mainly the central mystery. I've enjoyed all the mysteries in the series so, so much. Some more than the others, but for the most part, it was super exciting to follow the investigations and make guesses. This time, the whole thing felt... well, I don't want to say artificial, but it hinged on too many factors that didn't feel organic and were more like coincidences? There was a certain assumption at the very beginning …
“Have I told you I love you recently?”
“No, you’ve been cruelly reticent and I’ve had no choice but to be sentimental enough for the two of us.” Cooper shook his fist at the ceiling. “Curse this new burden of being the most emotionally healthy person in the house. I hate it!”
2.5 stars
Provided that we are dealing with Histories, it is apparent that Richard the Third is the first true villain in the Shakespearean world of characters. Richard so conceives the scope of unscrupulousness that he makes it absolutely his own.
His character, with the self-blinding belief, lives beyond the pages of the text. As it seems, he's going to stay with you. How many characters have done that so far, I wonder. Surely, Sir John Falstaff, Henry the Fifth and his father, Henry the Fourth, to an extent.
To the playwright's credit, force and stance are welded to Richard's soliloquies; a hint of which we get in the previous play in the so called tetralogy. The play opens up with the memorable line which manifests Richard's own perturbation at not being at the centre of the royal attention:
Now is the winter of our discontent
. . .
But …
Provided that we are dealing with Histories, it is apparent that Richard the Third is the first true villain in the Shakespearean world of characters. Richard so conceives the scope of unscrupulousness that he makes it absolutely his own.
His character, with the self-blinding belief, lives beyond the pages of the text. As it seems, he's going to stay with you. How many characters have done that so far, I wonder. Surely, Sir John Falstaff, Henry the Fifth and his father, Henry the Fourth, to an extent.
To the playwright's credit, force and stance are welded to Richard's soliloquies; a hint of which we get in the previous play in the so called tetralogy. The play opens up with the memorable line which manifests Richard's own perturbation at not being at the centre of the royal attention:
Now is the winter of our discontent
. . .
But I,–that am not shap’d for sportive tricks,
. . .
I, that am curtail’d of this fair proportion,
. . .
And therefore,–since I cannot prove a lover,
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,–
I am determined to prove a villain,
His 'discontent' bred out of maliciousness for others, ambition of power and bitterness about his physical deformity results in the intent to deceive through political manipulation and instinct to kill whoever comes in his way between him and the throne;
And thus I clothe my naked villainy
With odd old ends stol'n out of holy writ,
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil.
In the end, it is by manipulation through words that Richard presents a series of misdeeds which internalizes his crimes. His evil-ness is more of an inward belief in his deformed self rather than his physical deformity; that he 'believes' to be the only one the way he is,
No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity.
But I know none, and therefore am no beast.
Surely, the play works on the basis of heightened dramatization of a character's villainy led by extreme, selfish actions rather than the torments of mind one would encounter elsewhere in Shakespeare; and even though the play ends in somewhat of a whimper, the realizations of Richard's wrongdoings seemingly sudden (once we look back), it is hard not to get charmed by the import of its character portrayal.
I found it a particularly dry read. Fun to watch, boring to read.