The Earthsea quartet.

690 pages

English language

Published Nov. 11, 1993 by Penguin.

ISBN:
978-0-14-034803-3
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

(17 reviews)

8 editions

Review of 'The earthsea quartet' on 'Goodreads'

I was not much familiar with Le Guin nor the Earthsea-series before diving into this book. And it wasn't before the latter half of the fourth book in it, that I realized that I really liked both the setting, the characters and the stories. Individually, I would probably not rate them all this high. But reading them together did really improve the experience.

The first book, "A wizard of Earthsea", is almost like an origin-story that you'd expect seeing late in a series. The next three books all has the wizard Ged in them, but always as an older, mysterious figure. It's seldom his viewpoint you follow, but someone that meets him om their way, or that is taken away on an adventure by him. Almost like Gandalf or Dumbledore. But the first book explains his backstory, and you see him go from a young boy to a wizard. So …

Review of 'The Earthsea quartet.' on 'Storygraph'

That was some nice fantasy!
And it was - in my opinion - totally different than other sagas.
Not the usual Lord of the Rings - remake but with different characters but with a nice new story arc playing in different time periods, circling around one person but including other very interesting characters.
Loved it. Can recommend it.

ps: the end is awesome :)

None

I've read the first three books of the quartet three times, and the last one, [b:Tehanu|13661|Tehanu (The Earthsea Cycle, #4)|Ursula K. Le Guin|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166571534s/13661.jpg|2902890] once. I liked [b:A wizard of Earthsea|13642|A Wizard of Earthsea (Earthsea Cycle, #1)|Ursula K. Le Guin|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1303134026s/13642.jpg|113603] best on first reading. I was slightly disappointed by the second reading. By the third reading none of the first three books was as good as I remembered them, and the fourth, [b:Tehanu|13661|Tehanu (The Earthsea Cycle, #4)|Ursula K. Le Guin|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166571534s/13661.jpg|2902890], was positively boring.

So I would have given the first book four stars on first reading, three on the second and two on the third. [b:The tombs of Atuan|13662|The Tombs of Atuan (Earthsea Cycle, #2)|Ursula K. Le Guin|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166571534s/13662.jpg|1322146] three on the first reading, two on subsequent readings. [b:The farthest shore|13667|The Farthest Shore (Earthsea Cycle #3)|Ursula K. Le Guin|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1308953634s/13667.jpg|1322014] gets two stars for the first reading, and probably the second and third …

avatar for jelmervdl

rated it

avatar for johnke

rated it

avatar for rrees

rated it

avatar for herriott101

rated it

avatar for epilys@wyrms.de

rated it

avatar for undesgraciat

rated it

avatar for franksting

rated it

avatar for paudie

rated it

avatar for s_l

rated it

avatar for MochiD

rated it

avatar for Owl_of_Minerva

rated it

avatar for mraz_in_ivje

rated it