Shades of Milk and Honey

There's a really interesting take on magic (glamour) here that is absolutely fascinating, especially as it is considered a "women's art".

If you've read your Austen, you can see largely where the story was going, but it is absolutely still enjoyable. Especially with the more explicitly fantastical elements.

Narration by the author is lovely.

I’ve not previously read anything by the author, although I’d put a couple of her books on my wishlist. I decided to start with Shades of Milk and Honey since I was in a fantasy of manners mood.

The prose was easy to read, though some repetitions stood out. In places, the language seemed to stray between period(ish) and more modern.

The setup and environment will be familiar to anyone who’s read Austen—though with the addition of magic, and a reduced level of “formality” compared to what we might expect. I liked the idea of glamour as an additional tool in social interactions, and I’d guess in future books we might see more practical (military?) applications.

Unfortunately, I didn’t feel invested in any of the characters. They did not feel fleshed out. We spend the entire story in Jane’s point of view, and I found her rather tiresome. She was pretty passive and kept belabouring her problems, with a combination of feeling put-upon, gaslighting herself and feeling somehow smugly martyred. OK, the last might have been my imagination, but her ruminations tended to reinforce that impression.

The pacing was sedate until just before the final confrontation, when the tone flipped into melodrama with a rush towards the end.

I came away feeling that the book hadn’t quite decided what sort of book it wanted to be and so it wavered in its direction. Maybe a bit like Jane.

Mix of Jane Austen (poorly written) and a pinch of magic. I thought it was a fine idea, just poorly executed. Feels like it needed to bake a little more.

I can see why people thought this was boring. It's very low key and not a lot happens and the writing isn't particularly lush, but it was well written and interesting and easy to read and I'm hopeful that the books in the rest of the series have more action.

Shades of Milk and Honey Recommended by: Mary Robinette Kowal (on Writing Excuses)
Recommended for: people who like Jane Austen
Read from January 30 to February 11, 2014
Read count: 1
 
It was ok. I really wanted to like it, since I love Mary on Writing Excuses. Usually when the author narrates his/her own book, it is a disaster, but not so for this one. She does a really good job.The story is gentle, mellow. All the Jane Austen touches are nice, but it is too much like a 'faded copy'. Jane Austen writes regency romance, yes, but with wit and an ironic tongue. She makes sharp observations and questions, gently. Mary keeps the regency romance, but lacks both the wit and the irony. I know how much effort Mary put into it, that's why I want to love it... but I don't. Taking out the element that's the most important makes it bland, almost meaningless. It's merely OK. Maybe I shouldn't have reread all that noir urban fantasy prior to reading this. Maybe I should have eased myself into it by reading more similar works first. However, it got more interesting near the end. There was finally some action. Less sighing, swooning and moping around, more doing. I think I'm just not the female romance kind of woman (even though I love Jane Austen).

It was ok. I really wanted to like it, since I love Mary on Writing Excuses. Usually when the author narrates his/her own book, it is a disaster, but not so for this one. She does a really good job.
The story is gentle, mellow. All the Jane Austen touches are nice, but it is too much like a 'faded copy'. I know how much effort she put into it, that's why I want to love it... but I don't. It's merely OK.
Maybe I shouldn't have reread all that noir urban fantasy right before reading this. Maybe I should have eased myself into it by reading more similar works first.

However, it got more interesting near the end. There was finally some action. Less sighing, swooning and moping around, more doing.
I think I'm just not the female romance kind of woman (even though I love Jane Austen).

Shades of Milk and Honey is the first in a series of Regency Era novels with magic. Kowal’s debut novel, it was nominated for the 2010 Nebula1 Best Novel category.

Kowal is no newcomer to awards, she also received the Campbell Award2 for Best New Writer in 2008 and received Hugo3 nominations for her short work, including talking out the Hugo with her short, For want of a Nail.

So what do you get when you mix a talented speculative fiction writer with the Regency Period?  Shades of Milk and Honey been likened to Pride and Prejudice meets Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell or Austen with magic. 

While that gives you an idea of the type of book it is, it does define the novel in terms of other works. While I understand the need for catchy marketing, it does not do justice to the work itself.

So in answering my own question, what do you get? A delight.  Now I will admit that I am a fan of Austen and works set from the Regency era on to the Victorian.

The Tale

Shades of Milk and Honey is an intimate portrait of Jane Ellsworth, a woman ahead of her time in a version of Regency England where the manipulation of glamour is considered an essential skill for a lady of quality. But despite the prevalence of magic in everyday life, other aspects of Dorchester’s society are not that different: Jane and her sister Melody’s lives still revolve around vying for the attentions of eligible men.
Jane resists this fate, and rightly so: while her skill with glamour is remarkable, it is her sister who is fair of face, and therefore wins the lion’s share of the attention. At the ripe old age of twenty-eight, Jane has resigned herself to being invisible forever. But when her family’s honor is threatened, she finds that she must push her skills to the limit in order to set things right–and, in the process, accidentally wanders into a love story of her own. [source]

Kowal, like the director of a good Austen dramatization strikes the right chord in presenting regency mores and dialogue without trying to mimic Austen’s style exactly.  It prevents the work coming across as a pastiche and makes entry into the regency world a little easier for the less dedicated regency reader. 

Some examples will illustrate:

The Ellsworths of Long Parkmead had the regard of their neighbours in every respect. The Honourable Charles Ellsworth, though a second son, through the generosity of his father had been entrusted with an estate in the neighbourhood of Dorchester. It was well appointed and used only enough glamour to enhance its natural grace, without overlaying so much illusion as to be tasteless. His only regret, for the estate was a fine one, was that it was entailed, and as he had only two daughters, his elder brother’s son stood next in line to inherit it. Knowing that, he took pains to set aside some of his income each annum for the provision of his daughters. –  Shades of Milk and Honey

and

The family of Dashwood had long been settled in Sussex. Their estate was large, and their residence was at Norland Park, in the centre of their property, where, for many generations, they had lived in so respectable a manner as to engage the general good opinion of their surrounding acquaintance. The late owner of this estate was a single man, who lived to a very advanced age, and who for many years of his life, had a constant companion and housekeeper in his sister. But her death, which happened ten years before his own, produced a great alteration in his home; for to supply her loss, he invited and received into his house the family of his nephew Mr. Henry Dashwood, the legal inheritor of the Norland estate, and the person to whom he intended to bequeath it. In the society of his nephew and niece, and their children, the old Gentleman's days were comfortably spent. His attachment to them all increased. The constant attention of Mr. and Mrs. Henry Dashwood to his wishes, which proceeded not merely from interest, but from goodness of heart, gave him every degree of solid comfort which his age could receive; and the cheerfulness of the children added a relish to his existence. – Sense and Sensibility

Kowal gives you all the things that you love about Austen, the banter, the mores, the misunderstandings and then she seamlessly adds magic or Glamour,as it is called.

A subtly woven magic

So well is Glamour woven into the story, so well is its practice and place within regency society portrayed, that instead of jarring the reader as some might find with works such as Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, it flows and enhances the various tropes of regency romance.

Jane took the folds between her fingers and thinned them to a gossamer weight which she could barely feel. When she stretched them out, they spanned the corner in a fine web. Once she anchored the folds to the corner, the glamour settled into the room, vanishing from view. The gentle scent of honeysuckle filled the air, as if from a sprig of flowers. It took so little effort that she barely felt light-headed.

Glamour (the creation of illusion for artistic or cosmetic effect) is integral to the novel without seeming so and I think that is Kowal’s greatest achievement with the book.

For those readers out there who think “Pah! romance who needs it” .  Well Shades does have romance, but there’s action, duels for honour and really… everyone needs a little romance.  I found myself sitting on the edge of the seat unable to put the book down, in much the same way that once I start watching Pride and Prejudice (Colin Firth/Jennifer Ehle) I lose 6 hours of my life.

There are characters who remind us somewhat of our Austen favourites, Mrs Ellsworth shares some characteristics with Mrs Bennett, especially her nervous disposition.  This is handled well though and I see it as somewhat of a polite allusion to Austen.

I would recommend the book to fans of Austen as I think Kowal has captured the drama and feel perfectly.  For fans of speculative fiction Glamour is a perfect example of a thoroughly thought through and implemented magic system that doesn’t have roots in Tolkien or Dungeons and Dragons.

Adding value

In an era where some authors think it is a good idea to put Zombies into Austen or to cut explicit sex scenes into Bronte.  It is refreshing and inspiring to have a talented author add something of worth to the genre.

My only disappointment with this book was that it ended and for some reason I have yet to discern, the sequel Glamour in Glass is not available for sale as an ebook in Australia4 .

I have had to order the hardback, and I can’t tell you how much it vexes me to know have a broken set- one ebook and one hardback. Vexes me, I say. 

My poor nerves.

Thank you Miss Kowal, you keep writing them and I'll keep buying them, in whatever format I can.

1. The Nebula Award is given each year by the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA), for the best science fiction/fantasy fiction published in the United States during the previous year. [source]↩

2. The John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer is an award given annually to the best new writer whose first professional work of science fiction or fantasy was published within the two previous calendar years.[source]↩

3. The Hugo Awards are a set of awards given annually for the best science fiction or fantasy works and achievements of the previous year[source].↩

4. Neither does it appear that Shades is available as an ebook anymore ↩

My first book of 2012 is a good strong start: Mary Robinette Kowal's Shades of Milk and Honey, which I've been meaning to read for some time.

Much has been made over this novel being the "fantasy novel Jane Austen would have written", and to an extent, I do agree with that. I could certainly see Austen, had she thought to use magic in the stories she wrote, using it the way Kowal does--as a womanly art, employed to enhance the illusion of beauty on a painting, in a room, in an entire house, or even upon a person. Yet at the same time, a comparison to Austen is inevitably going to be a burden against which many books, worthy in their own right, are going to struggle. For my money, Kowal's prose didn't quite resonate the same way Austen's did. Yet this is not to say it's bad, for it is most assuredly not. I very much enjoyed the read.

I've seen Shades of Milk and Honey called out for not having enough of substance going on, that it focuses upon the relationships between the characters and lacks Austen's social commentary. For me, this charge is unfair; I certainly noted multiple points throughout the book that read as social commentary, such as our heroine's disdain for the notion of using her talents at glamour to make her nose smaller. Moreover, while most of these characters did not come across to me with the same force as oh, say, the cast of Pride and Prejudice--though yet again, many otherwise worthy novels would suffer in comparison to that particular book--I am honorbound to point out that that very novel focuses quite a bit on the relationships between the characters. And the ultimate main plot does, indeed, come out of that. So too is the case with Shades of Milk and Honey. The eventual unmasking of a callous rogue in the cast livens up the end of the book considerably.

All in all my only lament about this novel is that the relationship between our heroine Jane and her eventual love lacks a certain force, at least at first. So to some readers, it may come across as completely out of the blue. Still, I did quite like this and am looking forward to the next one in the series. Three stars.

I quite enjoyed this book. As is described, it's pretty much Jane Austin with magic. While it was great for the most part, I felt rather let down by the ending. It's not so much what happened that was the problem, but the feel of it I guess. I don't know exactly what was wrong, but it just lacked something, and the very last part felt too pat.

I enjoyed this book so much that I couldn't put it down. I finished it one day. Your results may vary, as I'm a complete sucker for anything that smacks of Jane Austen. While it's set in Austen's world of a small circle of neighbors in the countryside, exchanging proper visits, this book has rather more dramatic wooing than is typically seen�at least onstage�in Austen. The magic fits into this world beautifully, and helps drive one of the romances in a most satisfying way.[return][return]In addition to the content, I just have to say that it's also a remarkably pretty book. The dust jacket is beautiful, the pages are deckle edged, and the type is lovely.