A fascinating examination of technological utopianism and its complicated consequences.
In The Charisma Machine, Morgan Ames chronicles the life and legacy of the One Laptop per Child project and explains why—despite its failures—the same utopian visions that inspired OLPC still motivate other projects trying to use technology to “disrupt” education and development.
Announced in 2005 by MIT Media Lab cofounder Nicholas Negroponte, One Laptop per Child promised to transform the lives of children across the Global South with a small, sturdy, and cheap laptop computer, powered by a hand crank. In reality, the project fell short in many ways—starting with the hand crank, which never materialized. Yet the project remained charismatic to many who were captivated by its claims of access to educational opportunities previously out of reach. Behind its promises, OLPC, like many technology projects that make similarly grand claims, had a fundamentally flawed vision of who the computer …
A fascinating examination of technological utopianism and its complicated consequences.
In The Charisma Machine, Morgan Ames chronicles the life and legacy of the One Laptop per Child project and explains why—despite its failures—the same utopian visions that inspired OLPC still motivate other projects trying to use technology to “disrupt” education and development.
Announced in 2005 by MIT Media Lab cofounder Nicholas Negroponte, One Laptop per Child promised to transform the lives of children across the Global South with a small, sturdy, and cheap laptop computer, powered by a hand crank. In reality, the project fell short in many ways—starting with the hand crank, which never materialized. Yet the project remained charismatic to many who were captivated by its claims of access to educational opportunities previously out of reach. Behind its promises, OLPC, like many technology projects that make similarly grand claims, had a fundamentally flawed vision of who the computer was made for and what role technology should play in learning.
Drawing on fifty years of history and a seven-month study of a model OLPC project in Paraguay, Ames reveals that the laptops were not only frustrating to use, easy to break, and hard to repair, they were designed for “technically precocious boys”—idealized younger versions of the developers themselves—rather than the children who were actually using them. The Charisma Machine offers a cautionary tale about the allure of technology hype and the problems that result when utopian dreams drive technology development.
Two prominent subcultures within computer science academe and practice are "Free and Open Source Software" and "Startup Culture". This book made me think (uncomfortably) about the connections and commonalities of the two. Some of the most cringe-worthy moments from tech people come from someone thinking that a certain amount of skill at e.g. computer programming makes them an expert in a completely unrelated topic. This is a kind of anti-intellectualism; maybe it is sometimes needed, but it seems more often harmful than helpful.
Brilliant Book, especially for Teachers in the STEM field
No rating
Morgan G. Ames shows how a nerd's dream is shattered by the real world in this brilliantly written and equally brilliantly researched book. Particularly interesting is how Ames analyzes the psychological deep structure of the initiators and how this structure made the hardware of the final product virtually unusable. It's also a sociologically watertight account of how a good narrative, especially if it's technical in nature, can bring a future so bright that you have to wear sunglasses to see it. What also makes this book so good is that the findings and experiences in it also expose the current hype around makerspaces as an absolutely parallel charisma narrative. For "Vorsprung durch Technik" nerds, but also educators in STEM subjects, a real recommendation.
Brilliant Book, especially for Teachers in STEM subjects
No rating
Morgan G. Ames shows how a nerd's dream is shattered by the real world in this brilliantly written and equally brilliantly researched book. Particularly interesting is how Ames analyzes the psychological deep structure of the initiators and how this structure made the hardware of the final product virtually unusable. It's also a sociologically watertight account of how a good narrative, especially if it's technical in nature, can bring a future so bright that you have to wear sunglasses to see it. What also makes this book so good is that the findings and experiences in it also expose the current hype around makerspaces as an absolutely parallel charisma narrative. For "Vorsprung durch Technik" nerds, but also educators in STEM subjects, a real recommendation.
This book was a surprise to me. I knew very little about the "One Laptop Per Child" programme, and never really set out to learn more. I also did not expect a book about such a niche topic to be interesting enough for a duration. But Morgan G. Ames' brilliant critical analysis is about far more than that programme. It is about techno-utopic dreams and how they get inflated by the charisma of those who come up with them. OLPC was the brainchild of some of the founding members of the MIT Media Lab, and was put forward as a scheme that would empower poor children into becoming keen technologists in the future.
Ames' anthropological writing is sharp and often funny, her analysis is bulletproof, and her conclusions are damning. The programme was a complete failure: The machines were expensive, prone to breaking, under-used, poorly designed for purpose and unpopular …
This book was a surprise to me. I knew very little about the "One Laptop Per Child" programme, and never really set out to learn more. I also did not expect a book about such a niche topic to be interesting enough for a duration. But Morgan G. Ames' brilliant critical analysis is about far more than that programme. It is about techno-utopic dreams and how they get inflated by the charisma of those who come up with them. OLPC was the brainchild of some of the founding members of the MIT Media Lab, and was put forward as a scheme that would empower poor children into becoming keen technologists in the future.
Ames' anthropological writing is sharp and often funny, her analysis is bulletproof, and her conclusions are damning. The programme was a complete failure: The machines were expensive, prone to breaking, under-used, poorly designed for purpose and unpopular with the children. Although those behind it still hail it as at least a part-success.
What Ames does brilliantly is look at how the failures happened, how they are presented as successes, what the motivations behind these presentations are, and how bias is embedded in the (white, male, wealthy) ambitions of those who roll out technological dream-goals like OLPC. The perfect moments come when Ames takes aim at individualism as a learning mechanism, and how the OLPC founding team seem to neglect all the social roles that were involved in their own early love of computers.
The book is a brilliant application of Donna Haraway's methodology for "staying with the trouble" (which Ames references near the end of the book). It is also a very enjoyable read that uses accessible language and ideas and shrewd humour alongside even shrewder analysis.
