Review of 'The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century' on 'Goodreads'
1 star
I originally received this book as a Christmas present from my in-laws, and they earnestly thought I'd enjoy it for some reason. Friedman's position as one of the most celebrated establishment pundits is the clearest proof yet of Orwell's thesis in his essay Politics and the English Language, in which he argues that mainstream political writing is almost by definition bad writing in large part because it exists to defend the indefensible. And nowhere is there a clearer example of Friedman's terrible writing (the book's title is the result of the grotesque mangling of a metaphor about the alleged leveling of the global playing field) and mediocre thinking in service to the elite than this book. Still, after reading it I found myself with a better understanding of the values and assumptions of the people who laud Friedman and better able to explain my opposition to corporate globalization and "free" …
I originally received this book as a Christmas present from my in-laws, and they earnestly thought I'd enjoy it for some reason. Friedman's position as one of the most celebrated establishment pundits is the clearest proof yet of Orwell's thesis in his essay Politics and the English Language, in which he argues that mainstream political writing is almost by definition bad writing in large part because it exists to defend the indefensible. And nowhere is there a clearer example of Friedman's terrible writing (the book's title is the result of the grotesque mangling of a metaphor about the alleged leveling of the global playing field) and mediocre thinking in service to the elite than this book. Still, after reading it I found myself with a better understanding of the values and assumptions of the people who laud Friedman and better able to explain my opposition to corporate globalization and "free" trade, so I suppose I owe Friedman (and my in-laws) some gratitude.