15 years after the sons of Jacob seized power in the USA and became Gilead. The story is told from three female viewpoints; Daisy, Agnes and Lydia. Daisy struggles with coming to the realization of her past and who she really is, Agnes tells her story and life in Gilead, and Lydia contemplates her life and decisions made.
When the van door slammed on Offred's future at the end of The Handmaid's Tale, readers had no way of telling what lay ahead for her--freedom, prison or death.
With The Testaments, the wait is over.
Margaret Atwood's sequel picks up the story more than fifteen years after Offred stepped into the unknown, with the explosive testaments of three female narrators from Gilead.
In this brilliant sequel to The Handmaid's Tale, acclaimed author Margaret Atwood answers the questions that have tantalized readers for decades.
"Dear Readers: Everything you've ever asked me about …
15 years after the sons of Jacob seized power in the USA and became Gilead. The story is told from three female viewpoints; Daisy, Agnes and Lydia. Daisy struggles with coming to the realization of her past and who she really is, Agnes tells her story and life in Gilead, and Lydia contemplates her life and decisions made.
When the van door slammed on Offred's future at the end of The Handmaid's Tale, readers had no way of telling what lay ahead for her--freedom, prison or death.
With The Testaments, the wait is over.
Margaret Atwood's sequel picks up the story more than fifteen years after Offred stepped into the unknown, with the explosive testaments of three female narrators from Gilead.
In this brilliant sequel to The Handmaid's Tale, acclaimed author Margaret Atwood answers the questions that have tantalized readers for decades.
"Dear Readers: Everything you've ever asked me about Gilead and its inner workings is the inspiration for this book. Well, almost everything! The other inspiration is the world we've been living in." --Margaret Atwood
The Aunt Lydia parts were fantastic; the rest, less so. Learning more about the history of Gilead and how it was viewed and dealt with from the outside was wonderful and I'd have happily read a lot more of that. The journey into and out of Gilead on the other hand was rushed and overly neat. There was also a definite lack of urgency or surprise, but I suppose a relatively uplifting tale was welcome.
The Aunt Lydia parts were fantastic; the rest, less so. Learning more about the history of Gilead and how it was viewed and dealt with from the outside was wonderful and I'd have happily read a lot more of that. The journey into and out of Gilead on the other hand was rushed and overly neat. There was also a definite lack of urgency or surprise, but I suppose a relatively uplifting tale was welcome.
I don't think it would have worked as well for me without the tie-in provided by the series, but with that context, it was a fantastic read that I enjoyed tremendously.
So much hype, so much noise surrounding this book. At the end, I now have two main thoughts: firstly, I don't think it is worthy of a (shared) Booker Prize win; and secondly, I find it hard to believe that a person (Aunt Lydia) could act the way she did and not get caught in such a society, ultimately bringing Gilead crumbling down. If you are willing to suspend your disbelief and run with the story that, yes, she was simply biding her time and waiting for the appropriate moment to seek her revenge and cause the entire structure of Gilead to fall, then this is a great story. And in that sense, I romped through this book. However, it falls far short of Margaret Atwood's other novels - the majority of which I have loved simply because there is no neat resolution at the end. Unfortunately, this feels like …
So much hype, so much noise surrounding this book. At the end, I now have two main thoughts: firstly, I don't think it is worthy of a (shared) Booker Prize win; and secondly, I find it hard to believe that a person (Aunt Lydia) could act the way she did and not get caught in such a society, ultimately bringing Gilead crumbling down. If you are willing to suspend your disbelief and run with the story that, yes, she was simply biding her time and waiting for the appropriate moment to seek her revenge and cause the entire structure of Gilead to fall, then this is a great story. And in that sense, I romped through this book. However, it falls far short of Margaret Atwood's other novels - the majority of which I have loved simply because there is no neat resolution at the end. Unfortunately, this feels like a book written to tie in with the tv series and to answer the question posed at the end of the first novel: how did Gilead fall? And for me, not knowing Offred's fate and what caused such a society to fail were what made The Handmaid's Tale such a brilliant and chilling read.
When I first read the Handmaid's Tale, about 30 years ago, it had a powerful effect on me. I read it again, a few days ago, and this powerful effect is still there.
The Testaments though it's a different story, intense and strange. It didn’t provoke the same feelings. it is only barely connected to the Handmaid’s Tale novel with respect to character, style, or tone. It looks more like a political and theological satire of misogyny, corruption and apathy. It’s a thriller.
I was intrigued by the character of Aunt Lydia. A complex, twisted and ruthless character. A survivor. Her hatred towards the theocratic Gilead turned her into the monster she ultimately became. No action, however cruel, can stop her. And eventually she takes her revenge. She is a fascinated character, the backbone of the story, the one that connects all the other characters.
Thoroughly entertaining page turner...which is not something I'd have said about The Handmaid's Tale! I loved Aunt Lydia, I liked getting answers. Most the negative reviews I'm seeing are people who are wanting another literary masterpiece or don't like teenager characters in dystopian settings... So maybe skip it if that's you.
I listed to the audiobook and I thoroughly recommend.