An Extremely Well-Written but Not Exactly Rigorous History
3 stars
Greenblatt traces the journey of various great works of Greek and Roman literature and philosophy through the centuries, examining their geographic flow, challenges in preservation, and hypothesizing about the effects of their reemergence in Europe as a precondition to the Renaissance. The writing here is excellent, but the historical analysis is shakier, with many leaps in reasoning made with no supporting evidence, although the arc of the literary industry through the centuries is well documented and fascinating. Overall, this is an interesting and useful book on a fairly understudied era of Western history.
Stephen Greenblatt provides an interesting synthesis of history and philosophy. Greenblatt's love of the humanities certainly shines through. This stands as an almost over-exciting commercial for not only reading Lucretius's "De Rerum Natura," but in motivating the reader to actually go out to learn Latin to appreciate it properly.
I would have loved more direct analysis and evidence of the immediate impact of Lucretius in the 1400's as well as a longer in-depth analysis of the continuing impact through the 1700's.
The first half of the book is excellent at painting a vivid portrait of the life and times of Poggio Bracciolini which one doesn't commonly encounter. I'm almost reminded of Stacy Schiff's [b:Cleopatra: A Life|7968243|Cleopatra A Life|Stacy Schiff|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1294098301s/7968243.jpg|12020129], though Greenblatt has far more historical material with which to paint the picture. I may also be biased that I'm more interested in the mechanics of the scholarship of the resurgence …
Stephen Greenblatt provides an interesting synthesis of history and philosophy. Greenblatt's love of the humanities certainly shines through. This stands as an almost over-exciting commercial for not only reading Lucretius's "De Rerum Natura," but in motivating the reader to actually go out to learn Latin to appreciate it properly.
I would have loved more direct analysis and evidence of the immediate impact of Lucretius in the 1400's as well as a longer in-depth analysis of the continuing impact through the 1700's.
The first half of the book is excellent at painting a vivid portrait of the life and times of Poggio Bracciolini which one doesn't commonly encounter. I'm almost reminded of Stacy Schiff's [b:Cleopatra: A Life|7968243|Cleopatra A Life|Stacy Schiff|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1294098301s/7968243.jpg|12020129], though Greenblatt has far more historical material with which to paint the picture. I may also be biased that I'm more interested in the mechanics of the scholarship of the resurgence of the classics in the Renaissance than I was of that particular political portion of the first century BCE. Though my background on the history of the time periods involved is reasonably advanced, I fear that Greenblatt may be leaving out a tad too much for the broader reading public who may not be so well versed. The fact that he does bring so many clear specifics to the forefront may more than compensate for this however.
In some interesting respects, this could be considered the humanities counterpart to the more science-centric story of Owen Gingerich's [b:The Book Nobody Read: Chasing the Revolutions of Nicolaus Copernicus|1188644|The Book Nobody Read Chasing the Revolutions of Nicolaus Copernicus|Owen Gingerich|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1403850790s/1188644.jpg|959075]. Though [a:Simon Winchester|14053|Simon Winchester|https://d.gr-assets.com/authors/1286848563p2/14053.jpg] is still by far my favorite nonfiction writer, Greenblatt does an exceedingly good job of narrating what isn't necessarily a very linear story.
Greenblatt includes lots of interesting tidbits and some great history. I wish it had continued on longer... I'd love to have the spare time to lose myself in the extensive bibliography. Though the footnotes, bibliography, and index account for about 40% of the book, the average reader should take a reasonable look at the quarter or so of the footnotes which add some interesting additional background an subtleties to the text as well as to some of the translations that are discussed therein.
I am definitely very interested in the science behind textual preservation which is presented as the underlying motivation for the action in this book. I wish that Greenblatt had covered some of these aspects in the same vivid detail he exhibited for other portions of the story. Perhaps summarizing some more of the relevant scholarship involved in transmitting and restoring old texts as presented in Bart Ehrman and Bruce Metzter's [b:The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption & Restoration|240196|The Text of the New Testament Its Transmission, Corruption & Restoration|Bruce M. Metzger|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1388535910s/240196.jpg|232680] would have been a welcome addition given the audience of the book. It might also have presented a more nuanced picture of the character of the Church and their predicament presented in the text as well.
Though I only caught one small reference to modern day politics (a prison statistic for America which was obscured in a footnote), I find myself wishing that Greenblatt had spent at least a few paragraphs or even a short chapter drawing direct parallels to our present-day political landscape. I understand why he didn't broach the subject as it would tend to date an otherwise timeless feeling text and generally serve to dissuade a portion of his readership and in particular, the portion which most needs to read such a book. I can certainly see a strong need for having another short burst of popularity for "On the Nature of Things" to assist with the anti-science and overly pro-religion climate we're facing in American politics.
For those interested in the topic, I might suggest that this text has some flavor of Big History in its DNA. It covers not only a fairly significant chunk of recorded human history, but has some broader influential philosophical themes that underlie a potential change in the direction of history which we've been living for the past 300 years. There's also an intriguing overlap of multidisciplinary studies going on in terms of the history, science, philosophy, and technology involved in the multiple time periods discussed.
