Quaesitrix rated Snake, the Crocodile, and the Dog: 4 stars

This link opens in a pop-up window
Very fun adventure. This time Amelia goes on a search for lost explorers who may have found an unknown civilization deep in the desert. It has everything: lost explorers, a cryptic map, an yet-undiscovered civilization, betrayals and double betrayals and actually I lost count. It's immensely fun, and all the more for Barbara Rosenblat's lively narration.
The plot takes forever to start, I can't remember whether it was at one third or one half of the book but the introduction dragged on for way to long. Once the plot did finally start it was a fun mystery. Billie is likeable enough, though some moments were eye-rolling like with the purse snatcher. She did lose me at the end by deciding to confront the suspect directly instead of reporting them first... and being praised for her courage instead of reprimanded for utter stupidity.
2.5 stars for the book, +1 for the narration by Barbara Rosenblat (yes it's that good).
Unlike the first book, where the culprit and motive was blindingly obvious from the start, this one tries to be as confusing as possible. I wasn't very invested in the plot, but the main characters interacting with each other was very entertaining, especially with Barbara Rosenblat's skills as a narrator. Each character feels very distinct, the banter between Amelia and Emerson is great, and her Lady Baskerville is a lot of fun.
The ending was a big letdown though. Not about the murders, but the tomb. We have our characters obsessing about this tomb for the whole book, yet we don't get to see them finally get to the chamber inside??? We just timeskip from "murders solved, now we can get back to the tomb" to weeks or months later when they've finished and …
2.5 stars for the book, +1 for the narration by Barbara Rosenblat (yes it's that good).
Unlike the first book, where the culprit and motive was blindingly obvious from the start, this one tries to be as confusing as possible. I wasn't very invested in the plot, but the main characters interacting with each other was very entertaining, especially with Barbara Rosenblat's skills as a narrator. Each character feels very distinct, the banter between Amelia and Emerson is great, and her Lady Baskerville is a lot of fun.
The ending was a big letdown though. Not about the murders, but the tomb. We have our characters obsessing about this tomb for the whole book, yet we don't get to see them finally get to the chamber inside??? We just timeskip from "murders solved, now we can get back to the tomb" to weeks or months later when they've finished and are sailing back??? It's such a letdown. It feels like the author didn't finish the book and someone just added "oh by the way they did find a chamber in case you were wondering".
It's an enjoyable book but nothing amazing. I would have rated it 3 stars if it wasn't for Barbara Rosenblat's narration of pure awesomeness. She captures the main character so perfectly and is such a good narrator that she makes everything seem much better that it is.
The story itself is okay, it's nothing amazing and the villain is blindingly obvious from the start, the only real mystery being why Amelia falls for the obvious red herring. But it's entertaining enough. Amelia is written as being a character from her time and place (no weirdly anachronistic sensibilities or ethics) with all that entails (including the inescapable classism and racism) which can be off-putting at times, but the excellent narration made her much more likeable than she would have been otherwise.
If you want historical immersion, characters acting according to their time period, and detailed research, look elsewhere.
But if you just want some light reading you could do a lot worse. For me 3/5 doesn't mean it's bad, it's means it's better than an average "2.5 it's okay", but not great or mind-blowing either.
I didn't care at all for the romance itself, there was nothing really interesting about the ML and I spend the whole book wondering what the two saw in each other. In the previous book, I felt the same lack of interest towards the ML, but the gradual development of their feelings was much better portrayed I think, and I had no trouble believing that they were falling for each other, while in this book I never could believe it.
The horticultural society plot was entertaining enough on its own, however. The ending was a bit …
If you want historical immersion, characters acting according to their time period, and detailed research, look elsewhere.
But if you just want some light reading you could do a lot worse. For me 3/5 doesn't mean it's bad, it's means it's better than an average "2.5 it's okay", but not great or mind-blowing either.
I didn't care at all for the romance itself, there was nothing really interesting about the ML and I spend the whole book wondering what the two saw in each other. In the previous book, I felt the same lack of interest towards the ML, but the gradual development of their feelings was much better portrayed I think, and I had no trouble believing that they were falling for each other, while in this book I never could believe it.
The horticultural society plot was entertaining enough on its own, however. The ending was a bit abrupt: the sister just saying "never mind about that guy I resolved the problem for you", and we never see it as it happen directly which was a letdown.
In the audible version, Lucy Rayner once again does an impeccable job as narrator, though her style of diction for narrating might not be to everyone's taste. It's very slow and deliberate and has a mesmerizing ASMR-like quality to it.
The plot is contrived as hell : FL bound in a magical contract to the ML because she was in her neighbor's apartment and the mages didn't bother to check who she was when she opened the door? Right, good start book... 😑
The FL is insufferable. The premise of a witch who didn't care about learning magic or gaining power but only about doing the least amount of work seemed interesting on paper and is what drew me to this book, but it's executed horribly. Her "laziness" matters only as far as the plot allows, which is not much. It seems "slouch witch" means a witch who constantly talks about how she would like nothing better than be left alone to watch movies at home, and yet lets herself be dragged by the plot while complaining even though it makes no sense for her to go with it.
It …
The plot is contrived as hell : FL bound in a magical contract to the ML because she was in her neighbor's apartment and the mages didn't bother to check who she was when she opened the door? Right, good start book... 😑
The FL is insufferable. The premise of a witch who didn't care about learning magic or gaining power but only about doing the least amount of work seemed interesting on paper and is what drew me to this book, but it's executed horribly. Her "laziness" matters only as far as the plot allows, which is not much. It seems "slouch witch" means a witch who constantly talks about how she would like nothing better than be left alone to watch movies at home, and yet lets herself be dragged by the plot while complaining even though it makes no sense for her to go with it.
It already started badly with her inventing an injury to refuse a neighbor's offer of jogging (or whatever other activity, can't remember). Because she's lazy, see... she's a SLOUCH WITCH! But somehow she can't just say she's not interested, she has to pretend being injured. Ahah, lazy girl trying to avoid physical activity, how funny!
Then the plot is dropped on her —well, her neighbor's— door and it gets worse. She meets the magical society, who are snobbish pricks —there's a lot of those in this book— and agrees to follow the terms of the contract. I guess the intent was to portray her as making the best out of a bad situation? Probably? But it just comes as her being too spineless to stand up for herself and letting herself be cowed into agreeing to a shit deal way too easily.
There are few things as frustrating as a FL whom the author tries to convince you has spunk but who constantly acts like a doormat. Talking big in her heard but consistently acting too spineless to stand up for herself.
Then it only gets worse. All she agreed on was to be around the insufferable ML because of the magical plot thingy, so she could have just told him to fuck off when he decided on his own that she would actually work with him for real and that he would train her... because he's an arrogant prick who feels offended by the idea of having a fake apprentice. She bitches enough to make it clear that she has no interest in either working or training with him, and yet once again she acts like everything is unavoidable because the plot says so and behaves like a doormat. And the feels so proud of herself for managing to cheat a bit during training! Because she's lazy, you see! I'd have had more respect for her if she'd just told him where he could shove his training and had gone back to watching Netflix.
ML is an insufferable prick. Being told constantly how hot he was already grew grating five minutes after his introduction, and it became nauseating once it continued even after he proved how much of an abusive asshole he was —but it's okay because he's hot! did I mention how hot he is? he's very hot!
The "lazy unhealthy girl forced through punishing physical training but it's okay because it'll end up being good for her" trope needs to die. Painfully.
I gave up not long after the library scene and the hundredth mention of how hot the ML was. I just couldn't force myself to listen any more.
It started very delightful, but as the book progressed the characters became less and less believable considering the time period and their position in society.
Now I absolutely hate those historical stories whose MC has inexplicably modern views and wows everyone with her forward thinking ("OMG! You think women are people!"), and if it had been one of those I'd have given up on it very soon. To be fair to the author, she doesn't just pops a modern girl in historical clothes and calls it quits, she actually does a great job trying to integrate her MC in the time period. But I don't think it quite succeeds, it's especially noticeable the more the book progresses, and especially when it comes to the romance.
The MC needing to be good with a gun also had my eyes rolling more than once.
The spying subplot at the end was quite …
It started very delightful, but as the book progressed the characters became less and less believable considering the time period and their position in society.
Now I absolutely hate those historical stories whose MC has inexplicably modern views and wows everyone with her forward thinking ("OMG! You think women are people!"), and if it had been one of those I'd have given up on it very soon. To be fair to the author, she doesn't just pops a modern girl in historical clothes and calls it quits, she actually does a great job trying to integrate her MC in the time period. But I don't think it quite succeeds, it's especially noticeable the more the book progresses, and especially when it comes to the romance.
The MC needing to be good with a gun also had my eyes rolling more than once.
The spying subplot at the end was quite an abrupt shift and didn't mesh very well with the rest of the book. It feels very unnecessary and kind of a cop out.
Overall, still an enjoyable book. But if you value historical immersion over romance, maybe try something else.
I listened to the Audible version, and Lucy Rayner does a fantastic job narrating. When I started to listen, I thought I would get sick of her very affected diction very quickly, but surprisingly I find it very enjoyable. It's unusual, but I think it goes well with the text.
"Age of Swords continues the epic story of the war between humankind and the elves--and of ordinary people becoming legendary …