User Profile

jordanduke

jordanduke@bookwyrm.social

Joined 2 months, 4 weeks ago

This link opens in a pop-up window

Review of 'Shark Heart' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

Hovering around 2.5 maybe. It didn't really do much for me. I'm ok with the premise, I just don't think it added much value to the emotional impact. Throwing part 2 in right as we MIGHT get some of the emotional weight was totally unnecessary. The epilogue had more heart than the rest of the book by far.

And for those who say this is some of the most beautiful writing you've read…where? It wasn't bad writing, but for something consistently praised for its writing, I was left a touch disappointed. There were some downright cheesy lines.

Mike Bockoven: FantasticLand (Hardcover, 2016, Skyhorse) 4 stars

Review of 'FantasticLand' on 'Goodreads'

2 stars

Groooooooan. I originally DNFd this but I was bored and persuaded to finish it. This was so dumb. The decisions made by characters were beyond my ability to suspend my disbelief. And I just read Pet Sematary. I kept waiting for something. Some twist, some reveal. The closest thing we get is so eye rolley it’s insulting.

Nikki Erlick: The Measure (2022, HarperCollins Publishers) 3 stars

Eight ordinary people. One extraordinary choice.

It seems like any other day. You wake up, …

Review of 'The Measure' on 'Goodreads'

2 stars

1.5 stars. Edit to add: I listened to a bit of it as my gf listened because she wasn’t done with it and now I’m even more mad about how stupid this book is.

The premise is interesting but she didn’t really say much. If she hadn’t taken our current reality and just replaced any of the current struggles with equality and division with the strings, I could have been more on board. The Crash like ending was eye rolly and the lack of any meaningful arc left me unsatisfied.

John Steinbeck: The pearl (2002, Penguin Books) 4 stars

A novel.

Review of 'The pearl' on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

A strong 4. Having just read East of Eden, I needed me some more Steinbeck. The introduction to the books says he wrote this to play out like a film and it absolutely does. Speaking of the into, if your copy has it, wait to read it until after you finish. It gives basically the whole book away.

reviewed Annihilation by Jeff VanderMeer (The Southern Reach Trilogy, #1)

Jeff VanderMeer: Annihilation (Paperback, 2014, Farrar, Straus and Giroux) 4 stars

Area X has been cut off from the rest of the world for decades. Nature …

Review of 'Annihilation' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

Damn you Goodreads for your lack of half or quarter stars. This is more 3.5 to me. I think this is an instance of the movie being better than the book. Though I saw the movie first. So that’s likely skewing my opinion. The movie is also fairly vague and inconclusive. Which doesn’t bother me too much. It leaves room to take what you will from the story.

I felt themes of divorce and/or loss. I didn’t immediately made the connection. When I got divorced I remember seeing “dissolution of marriage” on the final paperwork. Only then did it really set in. I think the final part of the book being named “Dissolution” put me in that frame of mind. So maybe I was looking for meaning when there might not have been.

The biologists journey through the tower and past the crawler reminded me of pushing through grief, seeing …

reviewed Ninth House by Leigh Bardugo (Alex Stern, #1)

Leigh Bardugo: Ninth House (Hardcover, 2019, Flatiron Books) 4 stars

Galaxy “Alex” Stern is the most unlikely member of Yale’s freshman class. Raised in the …

Review of 'Ninth House' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

3.5 probably.

I had a hard time focusing on the audiobook for whatever reason. I enjoyed the book when I could focus, but it took me a long time to get through it. The cast of characters, geographic details, and info about magic and houses felt like it was spewed out endlessly.

The biggest reason I’m knocking the rating down is commits one of my least favorite storytelling sins. Loooong exposition by the villain laying out everything in detail while the protagonist records it all.

Edit to add: the overly descriptive nature of the writing didn’t feel like world building or setting the scene. It felt like a Wikipedia article and I think it diluted the world because I felt like I had to hold onto to some much information about the characters, the campus, the societies, and ultimately not very much of that mattered. Maybe she was just trying …

Min Jin Lee: Pachinko (2017, Grand Central Publishing) 4 stars

Review of 'Pachinko' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

Loooved this. The sprawling timeline, the way the language and mood of the characters evolved to match the more modern settings and sensibilities. The narration shifted perspectives so seamlessly. I was never confused about whose perspective we were getting even amongst a scene with multiple characters. In the first couple chapters, the cast evolved so quickly that I didn’t think I’d care about anyone by the end, but that is not the case. I’ll think about these characters for a long time.